Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp779874pxk; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:18:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/f9V5CA0yjYCoJKs0O/WQXLRT5y4xAgYKpJPGQe0wKDzmAVtY2IBKbcNj2RJ849G+NAYE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5488:: with SMTP id r8mr4930310ejo.483.1599891505753; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:18:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1599891505; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LUsiYVWn1RrsDFuvHo09WxXzrTY4xLDHD4uzZRlMaLKI9kKaSyG8QOBG4zvMo2krRn otysq0hEUulnp0ueIoPP22lGKo56gpz491g+c0sbFU2R1V+MIAW5t8nQMxb8RUcUIMhe Ijh5ZChDg/T0MV36g/+t1DEbN9Z+0HJwp71jEq5jlULIPw/8OSk7RcjBalc504ruYXc2 THlNQJ/1JZwfZKd9jIY65nY30WH87gHYwhc+jcx8+9ENsMiMxPwEfPsvv043e6y8S0hB pa8XL1a9004n7/8RFjUVVHFADCtaRLB5XH2nCsGeV6Y4FLSI/0JZNHGkYuL/miirbJER 4Xqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter :dkim-signature; bh=8cNsweGNzwXC6JGq44ACepZmdsIt6d6D7mF1Rzi6Wec=; b=g0nWks97nG4i4JLHz2qM9/qEFzrmAUkaabbSR7cQIGVbUP7wKhQRCkZWsRfp3KLiWF LyJV1Y0vyae53MunZWgyKVF+lq6gliC9PII9xzWiEZ2ySsCZkkDVsp6zWBDvK9Tyff2K 6YJhPozPnEcEGtc0OrUL1mIPyhFZCrDXm72kHiEJxxMUUI9Hm8QE8fiRQ621J3YceGpW TDKZq0yxm6EinmGv2lEEBuQsgzwxUTXcTdN/NnwdWwrhPFsdnWcdVRiPoC7C3jPAR/B+ LCPJRqjMFns2gqMbsoJmjVV4cwQqk4tkhtZmWD3gBAW1KibLKXz4s9plnNzRbqdXXWIt 47+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=YOql4Yso; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y25si2912210edv.59.2020.09.11.23.17.47; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=YOql4Yso; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725813AbgILGQ7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:16:59 -0400 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:55717 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725799AbgILGQ5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:16:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1599891415; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=8cNsweGNzwXC6JGq44ACepZmdsIt6d6D7mF1Rzi6Wec=; b=YOql4YsopLbLqyxA8BYauipEsKpD8kNHW9uLemCnAcsbMm1SF7wvVD5B2T/xD7Zn/mGOCcrb cpe6TK8xNH3BKdn9z1kbksvv9UjsIXuP9iFPeFAWC/0buSU7BN1hy7MATVBdU2CbSxJHFDal qLkQiDB1FOozzXjNAgmIMydznLo= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n07.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f5c67d77f21d51b307f64ec (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 06:16:55 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CEE36C433CA; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 06:16:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from tynnyri.adurom.net (tynnyri.adurom.net [51.15.11.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CBC2C433C6; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 06:16:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3CBC2C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Aloka Dixit Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: Add radiotap channel flag option for 6GHz band References: <010101747ee4b985-86863ec8-33e2-4f78-9d9b-93110bfa29fc-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <5225561f9f5c104bc84ab6e7f183de0ab5e0ea6d.camel@sipsolutions.net> <010101747eea64fa-83d17384-b161-40d6-8b9d-9dd3bbbe89b4-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 09:16:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <010101747eea64fa-83d17384-b161-40d6-8b9d-9dd3bbbe89b4-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> (Aloka Dixit's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:45:24 +0000") Message-ID: <87zh5v1pv4.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Aloka Dixit writes: > On 2020-09-11 13:39, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 20:39 +0000, Aloka Dixit wrote: >>> Radiotap header needs a new channel flag for 6GHz packets. >>> This change uses value 0x200 for new enum balue for 6GHz which was >>> previously used for passsive scan flag but has since been removed. >> >> You can't just add to radiotap in a kernel patch ... >> >> But also, just today I replied elsewhere saying that we don't really >> need a flag at all? >> >> johannes > > Somehow your reply to other patch didn't show up on the patchwork, > don't know why :-) Oh, this is making me worry. I do see Johannes' reply on the list: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/1cc7242cd00cd5141a56f17a7f5c80700485aa39.camel@sipsolutions.net/ But like you said, there's still nothing on the patchwork (even after 23h): https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11769643/ I hope this is just a temporary glitch, but if this happens again please do let me know about any patchwork problems. It will create major problems for us if patchwork starts losing mail. -- https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches