Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1382183pxk; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:55:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxn0TtervNu2lmtylwWAo0XChW2fpZbFMAhRXD2AE//sx65BmZwG17WrrTuFk5kvR5D56YJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:abc5:: with SMTP id kq5mr36374153ejb.284.1600451717701; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:55:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600451717; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OYOPDg1/xuEK6LBSQmq+zRQ8S2YdeKcXjgcrWDN34wpo4Km4ihZm3XeBD8RDTRzrhq Arr7m+0Z66ewc6xmuqepWXNaux6Bb+IFIT2x+UWyHFVu60cCwSdCv8OIZVqIKqe+nYaJ CB1lYj/80BkWpBoPiCoNgwl8Vz5WLrS7H9BzxvquIVPBOLB3jSDt7keDuwkTzBS7T1Pp 5HRG0KQC85VhqQjKZ0ekvm8Z/vkb8Qc0ZFNZHJTRCGgNPQN97CPHAH1PHTfSOheEFa6N qoefejRQGsovpVLRULbPfOtkvoDGvkyHeMhBaorNlJHXDucEkWO2y2r5hxgUhg4wv4wA Y3hw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:mime-version; bh=vgVjaF3INZUq0zQ3VkYLAYU3xjOGYom23BLWhyaVLWo=; b=SL9OOkmYm+VqaKgDPfpvY7yUFjfXApNhxdq4FDpNeRdJ8ATtcCbZSJXGz/1jIqbC/x KtRUTeuVAE1+xoLasDgEJ5EwIk8UxHI55tCDvfAhADgmfGi/neYz1zm/3eeOT2liPz5X p4JMbDYxSZbGwUY47/HN1zY5xNxnaWeTL+dZf0nt4HhYbOWrBTGyc1mnaG+WpqTaz0+h Onnqs404KENcTHELG5dPvcP/RNyCqMdG+c3CTOlazkvUUd7tWHTkoFngYQ1Qtghq1kqb sluimwnpStwz2ZqUzWPxzLtH5zF87TpGGnil64o2gF2wW/BAt4UMGiGTQ4lkyn2yyF+z RZqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k6si2689151eds.235.2020.09.18.10.54.52; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:55:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726126AbgIRRww (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:52:52 -0400 Received: from mail.adapt-ip.com ([173.164.178.19]:46048 "EHLO web.adapt-ip.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725955AbgIRRww (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:52:52 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 440 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:52:52 EDT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web.adapt-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BE74F9D9A; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:45:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at web.adapt-ip.com Received: from web.adapt-ip.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (web.adapt-ip.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kGALAGXC8HgJ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ibsgaard.io (c-73-223-60-234.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.223.60.234]) (Authenticated sender: thomas@adapt-ip.com) by web.adapt-ip.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B0D24F9D98; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:45:29 -0700 From: Thomas Pedersen To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/22] nl80211: correctly validate S1G beacon head In-Reply-To: <8b7f1ab8a15a06a23b7db2fb120e3144c482d7b9.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20200908190323.15814-1-thomas@adapt-ip.com> <20200908190323.15814-5-thomas@adapt-ip.com> <8b7f1ab8a15a06a23b7db2fb120e3144c482d7b9.camel@sipsolutions.net> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.7 Message-ID: <97924cf65e6806fd896ada049f3d46ea@adapt-ip.com> X-Sender: thomas@adapt-ip.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 2020-09-18 03:56, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 12:03 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote: >> The S1G beacon has a different header size than regular >> beacons, so adjust the beacon head validator. > > I've applied this already and will keep it, but you later add short > beacons - don't they need further adjustments here too? Yes, but I was planning on doing that in the (yet to be submitted) "add S1G short beacon support" patch. -- thomas