Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <1ec056cf3ec0953d2d1abaa05e37e89b29c7cc63.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [CRAZY-RFF] debugfs: track open files and release on remove
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nstange@suse.de, ap420073@gmail.com,
        David.Laight@aculab.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org
Date:   Fri, 09 Oct 2020 10:19:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20201009081624.GA401030@kroah.com>
References: <87v9fkgf4i.fsf@suse.de>
         <20201009095306.0d87c3aa13db.Ib3a7019bff15bb6308f6d259473a1648312a4680@changeid>
         <20201009080355.GA398994@kroah.com>
         <be61c6a38d0f6ca1aa0bc3f0cb45bbb216a12982.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <20201009081624.GA401030@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-1.fc32) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2020-10-09 at 10:16 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 10:06:14AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > We used to say the proxy_fops weren't needed and it wasn't an issue, and
> > then still implemented it. Dunno. I'm not really too concerned about it
> > myself, only root can hold the files open and remove modules ...
> 
> proxy_fops were needed because devices can be removed from the system at
> any time, causing their debugfs files to want to also be removed.  It
> wasn't because of unloading kernel code.

Indeed, that's true. Still, we lived with it for years.

Anyway, like I said, I really just did this more to see that it _could_
be done, not to suggest that it _should_ :-)

I think adding the .owner everywhere would be good, and perhaps we can
somehow put a check somewhere like

	WARN_ON(is_module_address((unsigned long)fops) && !fops->owner);

to prevent the issue in the future?

johannes