Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAO6ttSmiXPnA9z_31CV2rS=DO0c48jSJGBAkOgWiD-GOG73Ffw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+ASDXO75rYv29YvK=0zUkB494DsA_WA+n3UttRiko2awzUkOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <362f154dff1b4d6f88503af813eae406@realtek.com> <1f33cbf8-ccf9-354e-a0ac-0911c6acded1@lwfinger.net>
 <CAO6ttS=ABWLQbgRxfbxsqNwr9bkEDJm6dBbvaZAM94GKYP+txw@mail.gmail.com> <87h7qrq4p5.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
In-Reply-To: <87h7qrq4p5.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
From:   David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 18 Oct 2020 19:51:42 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO6ttSkXSt3UC5P-RDCDUhDC66MRb5UkvCcbT5POzkve9G=GyA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
        Andy Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

There's no possibility of including it on 5.10 changes? Seems like a
trivial patch
Or did the merge window pass already? I'm not aware of it by now.

Thanks though. Very much appreciated.

El dom., 18 oct. 2020 a las 6:11, Kalle Valo (<kvalo@codeaurora.org>) escri=
bi=C3=B3:
>
> David Rubio <david.alejandro.rubio@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb8=
2@realtek.com/
> >
> > I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test BT
> > to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi
> > though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (I
> > understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when having a
> > BT device paired breaks?)
>
> If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT coex
> issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multiple
> reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11.
>
> I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to
> wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200805084559.=
30092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/
>
> --
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpa=
tches