Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6744:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w4csp4885541pxu; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:44:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFF/J/gDSvWOQVVPl/EzO3YBcEELWH3IvG5Ie7zRikheJoIVuD5r3PRcQH81OFRjC9FHR/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9ef:: with SMTP id ce15mr3885263ejc.430.1603291463502; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:44:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603291463; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=koY9iOUDXGaMUaO3HNahDQb9+cw4GMoXU70odZzBWK1maXYVJyVxQx6JaUZpg9lAB4 oGUxqydPGrplyNzPensE4l5mJMjIe6N9wXgOhwfavAyHyQJcghfRuPKX856fEQ2PJ7Dq /upt9X05rKkU01fNAzc241SuHzK6Bs/QEnvxKTwXcPJUm/E0GMMGyZZMQCHUSt1GiI4X jGgOdrrWa/8BpsTv2TT+bP5Y7Sj0qUTxAPdltlq6h86MLKPcuI92vem80OrrDnWQYewL KCNktLCIM/8Y7HRf/pUfcFf7E1MyPNDalPJ4WzXv1KnbyGWk3tBtqTIYD33zWbZ3JQkJ v6aQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=7nt1N35OyhUe0ZizjlwSIWiCKo67Zjf8DchrnWxEdz4=; b=v0zgHosdraaYc+ZO1Bpiwe7oAhgDrfxR8MrMBc0T/uE9h7lXNIwWIHesFf+0x7IAx0 6yvizZW8XGH56+5N11E8FwctGlWalNklY0gqEsgLixacrKDvRR6DyOT2RygmB1teP3H3 5kY01YxAY1JLLeG5IBYJmunb4q3l7kHseJjnMikypcgFHaCtptzdg7cCD/qlY9D9F5Uf rp9hXuwM8r1sry9TzqEo0Lb/AfxuMIdbIDL8Yzb2jdw3v7smE1mRtuXmxmQkP735B680 rnzmlNSLEG98xMj7QIJmQ/C/iv7EqWGaFkjREwEXIN5kVJK8AuEU3t2IyviEVuKzB/IN DWWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="EW/Nq0Yy"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k9si1482550edf.377.2020.10.21.07.43.59; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="EW/Nq0Yy"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2443312AbgJUOMh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:12:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34230 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2442654AbgJUOMg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 10:12:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x542.google.com (mail-ed1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A217DC0613CE for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x542.google.com with SMTP id 33so2696143edq.13 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:12:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7nt1N35OyhUe0ZizjlwSIWiCKo67Zjf8DchrnWxEdz4=; b=EW/Nq0YyuPrFk+K1AkbEsMTzsC8p9MZ/6tlow10eND3oX209d0jlO3olwaTEGtLZrj QqKjKaTzAmrH8VIPls1F2Ll27Wd3vO/q0dWeldjmG1LKaZ415r8+hNzg4QJQE7GjLLLW i3sZdmYJVdVWvlhrSywHa95FjZ8ATlcz8uwtPHHSuC1Owm1C0ThLRYYvU7l9i5MGBfIj MHoRytUBywrl/CSqM07Mg1fwxez331QMEa8uk8v0TC7mPlNfmS4nPIVF1tN8ig7aMchf fMizP1qb/yBbBPTSr/E1h3VoYLJs++f3FNShUrRNqMq3oo0ZlUHQWKGZpg6cas1UfiOk eA8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7nt1N35OyhUe0ZizjlwSIWiCKo67Zjf8DchrnWxEdz4=; b=lTnUkqdIqKf0WmGtAFfqNq/aI2inPhxCSR6lfZcDO6kKHIg0rKHZ+2JTq3CU7tpX77 0/qj2S5DceMviCkyAucyyn3lRKWalWZKiaBwmnTQyu9TbZk5JKAbjnClnLfxZPMNONdB xTEhO92GLOsCoX2CpwDkAb8KXbTjiyISB2qpjNdXRMf95+qyAxGKfc5QPLaPl9u4xfK2 n7ZZRZLiaW7vG67ZI16IcVcAjX3w+ZC/0IKweEzx08Du2lLCwPeehenkLVTxIoguHFRg qHyx/j2xXdmFLhPfnTMk1365QORvYbMObwOA4glgeUe8QluX6sDCsHp0rWHNX7ODjj8p g2jQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531L7VktSn4airCprhcbq3tvVcqmDS0dWC7BVQXZs0cu18NmerFG fM8N87AspZGrrqTLsISqjh18qUytI8qLs5edsJQ= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c586:: with SMTP id g6mr3304547edq.343.1603289555167; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 07:12:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <362f154dff1b4d6f88503af813eae406@realtek.com> <1f33cbf8-ccf9-354e-a0ac-0911c6acded1@lwfinger.net> <87h7qrq4p5.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> <87bc4553-7f17-0c23-50c8-2b413de9f7b8@lwfinger.net> <50fda979cb584ea898681282926fcfef@realtek.com> In-Reply-To: <50fda979cb584ea898681282926fcfef@realtek.com> From: David Rubio Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:12:24 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rtw88 / rtl_8821ce: rfe 2 is not supported To: Andy Huang Cc: Larry Finger , Kalle Valo , Brian Norris , linux-wireless , Yan-Hsuan Chuang , Kai-Heng Feng Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org 5GHz. Haven't really tried 2.4GHz. So basically with that patch, 5GHz works ok-ish, and 2.4GHz is broken? - Kodehawa El mi=C3=A9., 21 oct. 2020 a las 0:41, Andy Huang () e= scribi=C3=B3: > > > David Rubio writes, > > > > Makes sense I guess. My room is 7m^2 so can't test beyond that. > > Small room issues, or well, not issues, I guess. > > > > - Kodehawa > > > > El lun., 19 oct. 2020 a las 14:10, Larry Finger > > () escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > On 10/18/20 4:11 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > > > > David Rubio writes: > > > > > > > >>> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/c0c336d806584361992d4b52665fbb82= @r > > ealtek.com/ > > > >> > > > >> I tested that patch. Works fine for me for wifi, but I can't test = BT > > > >> to be sure it works 100%. Most people will be fine with just wifi > > > >> though, I guess, considering the objections were mostly about BT (= I > > > >> understood -from the objection- that connecting to a AP when havin= g a > > > >> BT device paired breaks?) > > > > > > > > If the patch helps people to get wifi working we should take it, BT= coex > > > > issues can be fixed in followup patches. IIRC there has been multip= le > > > > reports about this so I'm leaning towards taking the patch to v5.11= . > > > > > > > > I changed the patch to New state and my plan is to take it to > > > > wireless-drivers-next once the tree opens: > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/2020080508455= 9.30 > > 092-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com/ > > > > > > Kalle, > > > > > > I had generated and applied that trivial patch to my GitHub repo with= the > > rtw88 > > > drivers a couple of months ago. Yes, it does get the user past the > > > initialization check; however, wifi performance is abysmal according = the the > > > users of the repo. It seems that the antenna selection of rfe 2 model= s affects > > > wifi as well as BT. Applying this patch will get wifi running; howeve= r, the > > > users will need to be within 1 m of the AP for it to work! I do not h= ave an > > > RTL8821CE chip, thus I have not tested myself. > > > > > > Larry > > > > > > David, > > What is the band for the test, 2.4GHz or 5GHz? > Without setting to a correct rf module for RFE type 2, you might encounte= r some > problems on 2.4GHz band. > In my test, on 2.4GHz band, with the wrong setting, it could not connect = to an AP. > > Tzu-En