Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9e8c:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y12csp731155pxx; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:51:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzE1Dk1gkJLs7J+usX7+G1DLzmnvmPKenz+54d5gKSXlnWk+IGbOYukHklecZuwPf1KPmaR X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:17ad:: with SMTP id j13mr1110422edy.347.1603925481482; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:51:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1603925481; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DONuv0eF4GLdrQA2PfsMNy3+RnEWwdan/BGGJkpukfwXCAIo78+dXlAQXz84Ot8b6q rkyp3tlaSVASqfUHWlRh4joyp7uLeZQiWyXaQSyjvsu6xi+GWGTdyz5i5GOrlrClqubN d+ARB0/TDok3dzKla2M2HO6JRJbED1RpMGMWKwwA+IR5bJonQNPo17QER+pftVaPm8E1 UzSNZg8SCDE9iV+nRhgAt2Lu49LtyYYMdsLhiAtDBETalFLOFyCzN0VNYHYx5kAAZpVJ zt4tUMvQ85d0BtmamxNQXyPFzKHNU5QtWnq2DgQDiHNEMhjGKAJ8OiBVektL3aJPk5Y7 lQ4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=X61PD0Eqa415e78dHBCu8gVP7gz9DiO/HA7a3ClV984=; b=UjFaSq1Yub+ndRl7P1Pnsy4rhvVmkE+hFkl/os8ABLkb9/bbZVF1yQ9r33+9RY5WFj HGbMz7jWa6pi4Y/DEyEs5e9TwjeKuj8Ve3oLgsnc1xOjQh6tuk1rsA/nDx/b5K/S5P3I AX53t2dKMioI68CEbC0eduCpt0UWJQyX7j7DSf4uPcWVUfgKuZs3Xkh6oZoeG31mEKgT KgCv+dqVguJvCQSV31QNnlZDFi1lz1J0B2N4t68JN0ZRmYqICDKPOtb2mGClKjaPvwNi R/wfoHBX4yekyqmL6HlCMMKF3WWEsao1hPZB/3D8Djh9A8mYbriu55yjMwaU0XpIGIkG TrZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=NEOWjCOd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rl12si513959ejb.98.2020.10.28.15.50.57; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=NEOWjCOd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389608AbgJ1Wue (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:50:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59156 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730232AbgJ1Wud (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:50:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-x942.google.com (mail-ua1-x942.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::942]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB459C0613CF for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-x942.google.com with SMTP id b34so186953uab.8 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:50:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=X61PD0Eqa415e78dHBCu8gVP7gz9DiO/HA7a3ClV984=; b=NEOWjCOdoW+dKxV90REiSNshDKbdF16fZjphJCyW4sXCsrz9B1bTlOsgmoBmn5SiEj Ttg/Sbh7iyvA1URHLm7Yhnoeex0MgCqwY9HsUCdVIe+5eud+5/AjV+fgOBuFzWp9p1bY GHQw4cFWy+Exvei93CFPwEI3PCFpZ5owzNGTU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X61PD0Eqa415e78dHBCu8gVP7gz9DiO/HA7a3ClV984=; b=Qpd6gxIiAGfeGlXxCPzAXUd4ybMwUZ4Dy5NMbGPADa5XIG9AWzuR3ODIwqy7IexURT a1NN2YGYHhRKz2M1m1smyaQOlizgwhqh2tUDklF/qrGcrTe/OEvwrXWz0HHaWa0rz8Ee 3lF1F6V08bdLTGXBFTtRwN1aQ9jwT2yegocBfNIMAbgLoly7sGum9lR3j9qYKQGoB6BO iHJW82YuM0hCo6X9eQHaFTxjvhOeDroUu7ppNfuPgBK7zYhxyRyYVqJVdrbiOohZllw5 pe0kzYOi+fSYUBLzvWvJAqnL72CSVz2Ln+JBa6mEaxto0OKjVt7bSZruknhxqwhp2lui tYPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xDxmQWTky6heVYT2tb/NlnV2fgFcBmgJCsmYcX8DOWIbmE/Lh 9JQkf5XrTXAyOMXRasaky/BaeY9kIxv97A== X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2067:: with SMTP id 94mr728595uam.141.1603910701429; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vs1-f49.google.com (mail-vs1-f49.google.com. [209.85.217.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u133sm29212vku.4.2020.10.28.11.45.00 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-f49.google.com with SMTP id h5so123436vsp.3 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:45:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a67:e3b9:: with SMTP id j25mr594499vsm.37.1603910699981; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:44:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1603904469-598-1-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <1603904469-598-1-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> From: Doug Anderson Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:44:48 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: Fix the parsing error in service available event To: Rakesh Pillai Cc: ath10k , linux-wireless , LKML , Abhishek Kumar , Brian Norris Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:01 AM Rakesh Pillai wrote: > > The wmi service available event has been > extended to contain extra 128 bit for new services > to be indicated by firmware. > > Currently the presence of any optional TLVs in > the wmi service available event leads to a parsing > error with the below error message: > ath10k_snoc 18800000.wifi: failed to parse svc_avail tlv: -71 > > The wmi service available event parsing should > not return error for the newly added optional TLV. > Fix this parsing for service available event message. > > Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC > > Fixes: cea19a6ce8bf ("ath10k: add WMI_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT support") > Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai > --- > Changes from v1: > - Access service_map_ext only if this TLV was sent in service > available event. > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c | 4 +++- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 5 +++-- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c > index 932266d..7b58341 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi-tlv.c > @@ -1401,13 +1401,15 @@ static int ath10k_wmi_tlv_svc_avail_parse(struct ath10k *ar, u16 tag, u16 len, > > switch (tag) { > case WMI_TLV_TAG_STRUCT_SERVICE_AVAILABLE_EVENT: > + arg->service_map_ext_valid = true; > arg->service_map_ext_len = *(__le32 *)ptr; > arg->service_map_ext = ptr + sizeof(__le32); > return 0; > default: > break; > } > - return -EPROTO; > + > + return 0; I notice your v2 now returns 0 for _all_ unknown tags. v1 just had a special case for "WMI_TLV_TAG_FIRST_ARRAY_ENUM". I don't have enough experience with this driver to know which is better, but this change wasn't mentioned in the changes from v1. I guess you had a change of heart and decided this way was better? > } > > static int ath10k_wmi_tlv_op_pull_svc_avail(struct ath10k *ar, > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c > index 1fa7107..2e4b561 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c > @@ -5751,8 +5751,9 @@ void ath10k_wmi_event_service_available(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb) > ret); > } > > - ath10k_wmi_map_svc_ext(ar, arg.service_map_ext, ar->wmi.svc_map, > - __le32_to_cpu(arg.service_map_ext_len)); > + if (arg.service_map_ext_valid) > + ath10k_wmi_map_svc_ext(ar, arg.service_map_ext, ar->wmi.svc_map, > + __le32_to_cpu(arg.service_map_ext_len)); Your new patch still requires the caller to init the "service_map_ext_valid" to false before calling, but I guess there's not a whole lot more we can do because we might be parsing more than one tag. It does seem nice that at least we now have a validity bit instead of just relying on a non-zero length to be valid. It might be nice to have a comment saying that it's up to us to init "arg.service_map_ext_valid" to false before calling ath10k_wmi_pull_svc_avail(), but I won't insist. Maybe that's obvious to everyone but me... -Doug