Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1064942pxb; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 23:11:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKjcT9vQ6cLD8Wvnut2TrO29vSIp78JRT5/dR04dOV+6l9RuNWIZxdWaUv7AdLT36daSQl X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2850:: with SMTP id s16mr763173ejc.276.1604646707342; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:11:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604646707; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=04IJ/7dRNfWfolc490bT1SuYc9JHpfHaEEkyq3fHqDHW670o8F4sLdsJttq2GGtqlm S6Ma6GUEg69DjfrGKuzLA+A54Hg0r5ai1gU7CYLmw6Ds1Lkr6bo7LOZac9hIExB1nLQw Rx36LUtis6eKRHkwhoU/20xntnAPOygmUqDXFCGx0Eyt0Vl9lI2r608M32pYYrFbvoE8 mD4Z9/HP/ePtkRuNLOl2JNfODlDrCzKoB5XsaEJ6Y0TQrmGTnlxFadtK/tPbEYTeSnlY g23kJ+wCHR9JPAmGCEb/ftFMc2hrysW2P5cdgMhXAvW7v+gHzbVQiWf9vHA9ck3/lNvP ldcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:date:message-id:user-agent:cc:to:references :in-reply-to:from:subject:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :dmarc-filter:sender:dkim-signature; bh=M7Jbb2/KtYXppLcxnwTJFUrf47vGgmwOSsDkYg4ptJQ=; b=iN+V4BUTC+81i2uscYXhqFzVyrmtGF7zRIRAtpndPIeAZ5Wed+86olbY7ZKAzX4XTg 8N8Zhn50VUQn87/QMYy3ynTSWf8Qk1gc4QgZstPH1wE9Z84fbr5P+Lsf+l/RcWiLcC13 usxqMDSMr/GdS9H+Aw+f/yVKLMe/KOz6qNw7uy9QwDPyGbjMbkyMuZtHfjsF5SZHw+sm OJ2WWBXHB1LjbXMwR9PlO+KZzThbFxXo+IHL0JTkHKD560VFMymwAPFbwanm1AThUNHI PBrIw5drriLkx+jO8g3/Cdxg1gQy8vWi0DsgRv+MQ3OIQE7xYwxAMSfKoo+xumBNAw1+ ywZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=SF62lS5R; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k16si229615eja.59.2020.11.05.23.11.12; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=SF62lS5R; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726050AbgKFHLJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 02:11:09 -0500 Received: from m42-4.mailgun.net ([69.72.42.4]:19275 "EHLO m42-4.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725848AbgKFHLI (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 02:11:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1604646668; h=Date: Message-Id: Cc: To: References: In-Reply-To: From: Subject: Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version: Content-Type: Sender; bh=M7Jbb2/KtYXppLcxnwTJFUrf47vGgmwOSsDkYg4ptJQ=; b=SF62lS5RbPPzO/cOgjOiN8DIljpKgIDQqtuLmD/CbxBEi2agC9ZqoIdYpMc11Ou37uZoFhMS Lv7A38+FazW5/SQD73c7AAykoMI9Rhxg10BAX6fsDZW90LqZm0r7MqMKT6bUefS7evrMbaAG scyXEze5nfjpB6dc8Z296fL1+us= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.42.4 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n06.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5fa4f70b42c6e77b6539057e (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Fri, 06 Nov 2020 07:11:07 GMT Sender: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D7CE3C433C6; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:11:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID,SPF_FAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from potku.adurom.net (88-114-240-156.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.114.240.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF211C433C8; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:11:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org CF211C433C8 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kvalo@codeaurora.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF selection From: Kalle Valo In-Reply-To: <20201020000506.1.Ifbc28707942179f1cefc7491e995814564495270@changeid> References: <20201020000506.1.Ifbc28707942179f1cefc7491e995814564495270@changeid> To: Abhishek Kumar Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kuabhs@chromium.org User-Agent: pwcli/0.1.0-git (https://github.com/kvalo/pwcli/) Python/3.5.2 Message-Id: <20201106071107.D7CE3C433C6@smtp.codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Abhishek Kumar wrote: > In some devices difference in chip-id should be enough to pick > the right BDF. Add another support for chip-id based BDF selection. > With this new option, ath10k supports 2 fallback options. > > The board name with chip-id as option looks as follows > board name 'bus=snoc,qmi-board-id=ff,qmi-chip-id=320' > > Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson > Tested-by: Douglas Anderson > Tested-by: Abhishek Kumar There were few checkpatch warnings which I fixed: $ ath10k-check drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c:1501: Alignment should match open parenthesis drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c:1512: line length of 92 exceeds 90 columns drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c:1521: line length of 92 exceeds 90 columns The first one was also what Doug commented. I also added Tested-on tags, thanks for those. The updated patch is in pending branch (soon). But is this patch ok to take now? I didn't quite get the conclusion of the discussion. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20201020000506.1.Ifbc28707942179f1cefc7491e995814564495270@changeid/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches