Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp142791pxb; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:07:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOiAtfeiopTV5RGjvVtL07Rca/PRkMQKn28A9fyv8vv02aAiCJlOOD7/lEgWXlg3rtOYHg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9458:: with SMTP id z24mr30009085ejx.318.1605164844718; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:07:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605164844; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=d6KvDk2EG9ClFrYmPCW+SbalFQlrEpHkTbB03Z3w0oVGCDlJkrMqVFl0UYW4rlmKau SXT/EmfJ4jZy/VAIUIprtLFp+LWT1BzaH3bEgNvEP/0UKw5Vhwk4cCBvWg+c2cUW2oMu HoxHsH972sJNZA4BWVPciAfxeb18tPhRGKsuAcnpMajUwCv7YB90lV0KDtzNs+qq5GNn Z67jznAspjuDqu+7JhgPRiI4katnPzZG5DPkQOtG1uznTt/T5AU73EC+3gx1Qd2gapoQ H6EtTbjLeINZHbPkDB4HMOB0OuiHTDV21+E8RuXbPSM5TZIwVoSu4bJ3Zje2aMqPRIfn Gglg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=BZw8W3e5JaggV002YMPj75YAgKJfnWGBQClqtRpA28I=; b=ihOJHYFjn+haoUAVgSs+vz83zR8T3CH9lq8uPq6U+/GHqoPr1/gCREcT+q+y9MiZ++ 7pAAz7KrgRkhPSgPj6p9Q4vy96AIUpuoASyVGQz4GfaiQlNKgx2xOJ/D3fFhX1uQuyLR n0rbVIhp+nNaNFHyzaLkih/SjwK1gco0iFIgXHxppoyn8hsG166+X8Z8oi2N1STVSE+v HcQA9OtGOHh5ecdmbqgxa3fgLWCs/gP2hmOXynRi49VwIMacjBL+yLi0i5Kbnb26L8pm zZyaO9v8fQISFdPsFX3LRNAr/YwT9MOim/qUEi8hnDHQvVR/xb3yFQbsIoVKFcSmdd0V CHLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e1si2815878ejf.335.2020.11.11.23.06.53; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:07:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726466AbgKLHF6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:05:58 -0500 Received: from www84.your-server.de ([213.133.104.84]:47384 "EHLO www84.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725898AbgKLHF5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:05:57 -0500 Received: from ipbcc25655.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([188.194.86.85] helo=[192.168.0.7]) by www84.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1kd6fw-00053Q-Ns; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:05:44 +0100 Message-ID: <0b58872b4f27dbf5aad2a39f5ec4a066e080d806.camel@seibold.net> Subject: Re: pci_alloc_irq_vectors fails ENOSPC for XPS 13 9310 From: Stefani Seibold To: wi nk Cc: Kalle Valo , Thomas Krause , Govind Singh , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Devin Bayer , Christoph Hellwig , Bjorn Helgaas , Thomas Gleixner , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 08:05:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20201103160838.GA246433@bjorn-Precision-5520> <874km61732.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87mtzxkus5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wnz0hr9k.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87ft5hehlb.fsf@codeaurora.org> <6b60c8f1-ec37-d601-92c2-97a485b73431@posteo.de> <87v9ec9rk3.fsf@codeaurora.org> <87imab4slq.fsf@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: stefani@seibold.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.102.4/25985/Wed Nov 11 14:18:01 2020) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2020, 02:10 +0100 schrieb wi nk: > I've yet to see any instability after 45 minutes of exercising it, I > do see a couple of messages that came out of the driver: > > [ 8.963389] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x16005 > [ 11.342317] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Unknown eventid: 0x1d00a > > then when it associates: > > [ 16.718895] wlp85s0: send auth to ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) > [ 16.722636] wlp85s0: authenticated > [ 16.724150] wlp85s0: associate with ec:08:6b:27:01:ea (try 1/3) > [ 16.726486] wlp85s0: RX AssocResp from ec:08:6b:27:01:ea > (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=8) > [ 16.738443] wlp85s0: associated > [ 16.764966] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlp85s0: link becomes > ready > > The adapter is achieving around 500 mbps on my gigabit connection, my > 2018 mbp sees around 650, so it's doing pretty well so far. > > Stefani - when you applied the patch that Kalle shared, which branch > did you apply it to? I applied it to ath11k-qca6390-bringup and when > I revert 7fef431be9c9 there is a small merge conflict I needed to > resolve. I wonder if either the starting branch, or your chosen > resolution are related to the instability you see (or I'm just lucky > so far! :)). > I used the vanilla kernel tree https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-5.10-rc2.tar.gz. On top of this i applied the RFT-ath11k-pci-support-platforms-with-one-MSI-vector.patch and reverted the patch 7fef431be9c9