Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: ath11k with QCA6391
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org
References: <c9fb5fa6-297e-a595-7670-c9105641bc83@doubly.so>
 <87wnz3twvo.fsf@codeaurora.org>
 <5f3ee526-e96f-3c88-a17e-e7ebf9703ed1@doubly.so>
 <87d00uo85x.fsf@codeaurora.org>
From:   Devin Bayer <dev@doubly.so>
Message-ID: <48f37c07-ca63-7ba9-1518-a31681777b15@doubly.so>
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:22:19 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87d00uo85x.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 03/11/2020 14.56, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Devin Bayer <dev@doubly.so> writes:
> 
>> On 02/11/2020 19.51, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>
>>> To my knowledge, from ath11k point of view, QCA6391 should look the same
>>> as QCA6390 but most likely the board file for QCA6391 is different.
>>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> They are different than those from your repo, but maybe I can use
>> bdwlan01.e04 as the board file.
> 
> Yes, that's what I would also suggest to test first: take the firmware
> from ath11k-firmware.git and the board file from the vendor.

I would like to report that with your latest qca6390-bringup branch my QCA6391
card is working well with just the one MSI vector. I'm using the board file for
6390 from the linux-firmware repo.

Thanks for the fixes :)

~ dev