Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4138783pxu; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:16:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHUjqkZ7ugEPnSEGG9CFqX/Y8pkxBQbIRHlP39DfE1ThkHut/CkvXyA5E8QcUraBpOVbRE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4705:: with SMTP id y5mr2916945ejq.112.1607534198544; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 09:16:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607534198; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pt16z8xYbOUGDboTXhy3P5cAXiezgpB3L6VRfolFuBBQJKmtYJPkJmoxqZzwqKGw9C kLYlDN4yOi8AATJo7DsIG3Di7A46bSenyYsfpmuAHJ3w9L/nceEl8cCtXFc4rwZ+/m4/ Xoab8tRCnVRrCma2rhnSBVBcN3T/wkD4E/HNhVB9subNDGIWC1MTLnBQwK8q1ERM6kQx OJCVA5RxVFyLr7iYIVWOnJjWVkpzTjaz6RGq42++347N8ooAd9FvGf9UCQWss4kvQ1tV DrEwur0rOxDKBRVEwR7NtowirJQoQjQ7q7XHyIzmBg9uruwNMVVgXTZ/nbCVc961CC9c ui5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :date; bh=WSdbuJGwkb0KJLpGEVJB05lN98ndaTFw4ZrzqIaLMdg=; b=ToTOeLEgnUHSULbSIcIcFJ33Eb7E208s046VzTm8V4otMNpVkgtLMkgql9z9u6VHom FVG4EQdgAAzPorFdalkKVNoqZsBGjS0IUlUarKs5XoqLvmR+OSKNgTa6wpz/iJ3ZZMKG i2JeulTCGnDhM3ZvYPtUuIiCWnh7VQFlVskhcTUdNsRyu0s1ol/2pH/Ag9o4pArfDjMW p2W/klz/b1wWMwwgDFgGaU43sHqCD2k42IL3gd7XnSBQpHczm2En977t5dAD3n1/oQ0F +rmdOTFg5pOX1Hxhjb9BBPnmFpYXSiAln8o6MlTLbjooFzkg8Mhj3svpfp3QUsrttiJz OrZw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ixcNaOLz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c20si1146481edw.222.2020.12.09.09.16.02; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 09:16:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ixcNaOLz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732390AbgLIROE (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:14:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33582 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732621AbgLIRN5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:13:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:13:15 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1607533996; bh=yx06fepjWrRwJsnGMb//hVPuQcpepHhze51LMVwFV1I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ixcNaOLzH2DMiDXDGCa4CtxnjvQ8O82WY5+6MFhPSqIJ07648uXKpmh1hsdVQXUQw MyBgcRHnh70t1PzLYoxFcMrwYI5sYIaMtzje1sT8Uxvd4xz2Xd8gQn62aMz7ijVBCl vwp1J6Sz4+03vESaLFOXONZKEdATeNCM3vQYHfZTDO6eZBCI4qmUsCGRIspVKkCQ95 MLEym5YWMnQhJri8OC4WQyITjhD7cc00WXkmwsY7JTuwtJjiz1PQheb5Z6tGQv2GHy 6bor31wFJ3AEOxM2sETqjC4owE8uNWl8yVa6mokkfXaxJ7m2uOEG3mQ5jvETB9QBsd pXRgPU05fsXsA== From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Coelho, Luciano" Cc: Rui Salvaterra , "Goodstein, Mordechay" , "Berg, Johannes" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [BUG] iwlwifi: card unusable after firmware crash Message-ID: <20201209091315.2c55e1c6@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4eb99a1da6342999c4dca355533a0847d0e942a5.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:48 +0000 Rui Salvaterra wrote: > Hi, Luca, > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:27, Coelho, Luciano wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:27 +0000, Rui Salvaterra wrote: > > > > > > [ 3174.003910] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio. > > > [ 3174.003913] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: reporting RF_KILL (radio disabled) > > > > It looks like your machine is reporting RF-Kill to the WiFi device. > > Yes, that's an artifact of how I tested: I rebooted the router, the > Wi-Fi interface disassociated and the dmesg was clean. However, after > the router came up, the laptop didn't reconnect (and the connection > had completely disappeared from nmtui). Afterwards, I did the rfkill > cycle you see, and only then I got the register dump. > > > There seems to be some sort of race there that is causing us to still > > try to communicate with the device (and thus you see the transaction > > failed dump), but that will obviously fail when RF-Kill is enabled. > > I'm not sure about that, the card was already dead before the rfkill cycle. Any luck figuring this out, Luca? If this is a 5.10 regression we need to let Linus know tomorrow, so the time is ticking :(