Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp14227750pxu; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:04:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqczftr75HHBpywNPvZXFjav8M+85ngAv9g3ucR6PkDV0+Q4QJIFGXAjMwc9i3xreOPw0D X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c10:: with SMTP id ga16mr68424877ejc.43.1609808643092; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:04:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609808643; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mYknig/yajHSQbT7uCCxpIo1M4tGm+xc7vAOxBr3ClqizMI3FadXEBcw7CXrx7lPKM 2h9FFdnQFXgVF3q/JOjhTeifN5lyfJg9P9ZYEdefBDconxFxBn9i/bSa3faUo+Ps84Os SkahN8EljEEECTjKg/0sOWnHvAwnuRYmoJpp+miBjzYfTpjoo0e0W1Ctsp33n0D7Z6/X bYa77elUUDF2nafuvW1vmVSWcGGqSaxAMNxpA95RzBAsYBIOCq6lOj2LXXy76pO7h+pD d685gei3xW8hz8YyVYCkNL89jC52m7iXggtQYf6pN6k2GCgL6oTOypemvyEl9uTkMmKM 5Paw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=v48H7oiRicse2e11HHTzN4+ZiDQXvkalq4s6gzeFvwY=; b=gC/+z/YogcPXzS8Mnth5DuvctHwucwR1PwRfd/iTbB5yCsYZVdz5h8vVutanOWpsps +m3nH1B1zYH0JhR0rgxDsVDp64fIe0qdxGCzH2Pe3vfxR1sEYDxbO6hJfdrt2y8I261T I2rD9qWEPyd/Fe9EPbuakcVXilnDz5rtQZJ6U3ErEum+pKDyav8PdxPvUyTbVA98uCHm bwTvzUtIrTozzLIfI17n4AjfD7awNE88na/Vc5uHMwm/bBg9KMTJr0i2yjtUhEsTLHic sa7ugztTz+Pzoybu6jbUEXqvCDpSR7/8CTLpbVFZXg1RroX0fTVKCCLib5K6qpU+Dkca Jvjw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@candelatech.com header.s=default header.b="Wu+ze/7I"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=candelatech.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h16si29561115ejt.260.2021.01.04.17.03.38; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:04:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@candelatech.com header.s=default header.b="Wu+ze/7I"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=candelatech.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727987AbhAEBCX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:02:23 -0500 Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:37348 "EHLO mail3.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728670AbhAEBB7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:01:59 -0500 Received: from [192.168.254.6] (unknown [50.46.152.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F25C13C359; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:01:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail3.candelatech.com 2F25C13C359 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=candelatech.com; s=default; t=1609808476; bh=8uouPfJmxEzF/g181Ay37CCyCQ6IK3/S1E5TKxAqrpo=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Wu+ze/7Il2zlJBgYcmviW4eD9ZmwFa3y9u94msE0Q3YCwV6Z8P8sNsPK8dpy0z7Li p0jdgGcL1cvgQMQnH/eEAi8YY9gU5YLEzuPdmyWi6iwe39PilYMB3OI1Ujxpb1B640 wzqieTFlFuMJ6u3Px/CTtPYcuadIp/eQ3OrmSYdQ= Subject: Re: RX rate is wrong in 5.10? (bisected to: mac80211: receive and process S1G beacons) To: Thomas Pedersen Cc: ath10k , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <584816e2-ed18-3d5e-651e-293637222148@candelatech.com> <5dc86950-1672-6900-dad4-3b437f4959c5@candelatech.com> <772a3a0517eb4d4cc6cee975e5fde100@adapt-ip.com> From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:01:15 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <772a3a0517eb4d4cc6cee975e5fde100@adapt-ip.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-MW Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 1/4/21 4:25 PM, Thomas Pedersen wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 2021-01-04 16:18, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 1/4/21 8:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I noticed that RX rate is always 6Mbps when I use -ct firmware and -ct driver in >>> 5.10, and on stock 5.10.0 driver and stock firmware, rx-rate does not show up at >>> all in 'iw dev wlan1 station dump'. >>> >>> I'm using 9984 NIC... >>> >>> Anyone else see this? >> >> After a bisect, the first bad commit shows this: >> >> commit 09a740ce352e1a1d16b9984115514ba9a4f4704b (refs/bisect/bad) >> Author: Thomas Pedersen >> Date:   Mon Sep 21 19:28:14 2020 -0700 >> >>     mac80211: receive and process S1G beacons >> >>     S1G beacons are 802.11 Extension Frames, so the fixed >>     header part differs from regular beacons. >> >>     Add a handler to process S1G beacons and abstract out the >>     fetching of BSSID and element start locations in the >>     beacon body handler. >> >>     Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen >>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200922022818.15855-14-thomas@adapt-ip.com >>     [don't rename, small coding style cleanups] >>     Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg >> >> From a glance through the diff, I'm at a loss as to why it causes the >> symptom.  I manually >> double-checked the bisect, an it appears correct. >> >> What I see is that in the commit before this, I see a useful rx rate >> (1.3Gbps for instance) >> in 'iw dev wlan1 station dump', but in this bad commit, both show >> 6Mbps rate.  (Tx rate >> in ath10k is probably broken for other reasons, so I only bisected the >> rx side issue.) >> >> I'm using ath10k 9984 radio with firmware 10.4-3.9.0.2-00070 in station mode. >> >> AP is an ath11k Hawkeye... >> >> I'm using a 1Mbps UDP packet 'download' stream to make sure I'm seeing >> rates for data frames >> and not just management frames. > > Sorry about that. > >> Any idea what might be the issue? > > It may be fixed by https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/1607483189-3891-1-git-send-email-wgong@codeaurora.org/ Yes, that fixes it. Looks like it is already in 5.10.4 stable, so I'll upgrade to that. Thanks for the quick hint. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com