Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2488896pxb; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:47:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw59go0oGTyLo2G96ReXwNxZKsdWyb7+E+T0qyAp0yxpncufQ1uWLKbnU+/dvX/wRR88H+Q X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:778e:: with SMTP id ky14mr10417380ejc.154.1613080064158; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:47:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613080064; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OjK8HJuMeb7JP76J31qOHWQaGA8G1KuB+dvuOX1+LyilYiEi51wJckvAJDxT5fRpn8 Arwoe1M6Dkf8QVFBwhYe2Q1s6LxWcC9PlD7OqiAeUg0fjMQdRuKYBMUYGq5LrY+mGOuQ yd2hHQ5Uptp/L/eLkbcm4miLOccWffOSmcvo/nxUMETMa3WHdQT8OoDQ7vjXK/Gl6+8F 867aIxRlp3eWWUMjcsDWd25JFJVzXrIy444IeEnaR5N6shJhdv9wjf1NdEcdTv8vpMzl R5AJuEsHQak7NAxIeohPKszEBclaBeVFM0Z+hCOvZdluuxEq1TSWGs0GCFtnhwyqWRmC s2Zw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=7GX0yjNQFTjQCsRbiDjdIv8zpJDCXjj9Qyl2U9BU7T0=; b=jum9KpkX9dbAGfsSPU/YsrTizL9LyyXDg2q2KoqSWHEMIN/IHO6rKZVAta2rmuYlUk DNpVH3fILaY3LNAhWcJ2ndEQhJL1UsxrSM6+xkLe2re9f7bTDJ7Q5YneiVQmRvKt8XI4 8S65CXFnqQXmstShZaK1npwOsboNeylCGF9sYuqr3imPkgbdrM52/F2si6FqbrjDjPnL 8sFLBrIBd2zaAO4yJn+Y5hTeM7cXgK7wF3DaWVV7klLgmAKa6nHJJCtGJGzDLHSv7r/k WqQz5uGVxdGCzlh18EwlqmRiYWSYwNzqVXWnymu++HjSiT2oPm+F+tpX2jaLbW+Pu8hG ngDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="l/opHI+0"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h22si4525987eje.389.2021.02.11.13.46.50; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="l/opHI+0"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229564AbhBKVm1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:42:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36952 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229521AbhBKVm1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:42:27 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 613D86186A; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:41:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1613079705; bh=aU0WQFKgZ7qFFXrEI7PNdC/5P8ugCuwovTQGDn0C3yo=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=l/opHI+0il9KzglD6uVpi0uFpIXnysoqVYvkfGbRYzH4V1zgBRYWbNJfnV7Lk3eQ8 OxW89569gYWUFyF8n4Kjnf6490g7jYXRM/fyA4cBem0m4r9o8tZcnn/l3M7qPTQQca 9NBjLpiyw1IQzUO2qdMlve66b0+bq0GdoUqlXf3wEvgV21JuQIjyhhUnc/dJ3MSHpJ qea+dlVjMimOJOUN0HMHvkCbs3xe6DcbrdaZssX3xYcgvcnvEVtWaRkCHAF5j4yEDi ObJQE1SzMxo6Zj03npr3egbrequS6qXXLzqObq+8bxKCuD/+KxZMoHp38RBqcL9Rv9 5EPI/hyxFVDSg== Subject: Re: Today's linux-next iwlwifi broken To: Luca Coelho Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <582d5521f31a49e3518d15811ca7d5a79837a70e.camel@coelho.fi> From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: <633c6919-5f3f-9b7c-8f21-2682f8c69ccd@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:41:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <582d5521f31a49e3518d15811ca7d5a79837a70e.camel@coelho.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 11.02.2021 21:23, Luca Coelho wrote: > On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 17:10 +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> Today's linux-next has a bunch of issues, at least with my AX210 (0024) card. >> >> First I got a GPF in iwl_request_firmware(), cfg->fw_name_pre was invalid. >> After some digging into it I found that 6f60fb03c8e7 ("iwlwifi: move SnJ >> and So rules to the new tables") removed the entries for some cards. >> Obviously 5febcdef3090 and 9b15596c5006 weren't synced with some parallel >> development. >> After adding the entry for 0024 I now get the following lockdep warning. >> Isn't there any regression testing with lockdep enabled? >> Also warning "api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver" is still >> there, IIRC we talked about this weeks ago. >> >> >> [ 4.561774] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) >> [ 4.630849] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Direct firmware load for iwlwifi-ty-a0-gf-a0-61.ucode failed with error -2 >> [ 4.639817] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: api flags index 2 larger than supported by driver >> [ 4.640062] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: TLV_FW_FSEQ_VERSION: FSEQ Version: 93.8.73.28 >> [ 4.642138] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: loaded firmware version 60.84d9abea.0 ty-a0-gf-a0-60.ucode op_mode iwlmvm >> [ 4.760541] iwlwifi 0000:01:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX210 160MHz, REV=0x420 >> [ 4.942350] irq/131-iwlwifi/2094 just changed the state of lock: >> [ 4.942358] ffffa3fc07f080b0 (&rxq->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x7c/0x8b0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.942504] 1 lock held by irq/131-iwlwifi/2094: >> [ 4.942511] #0: ffffa3fc0855c170 (sync_cmd_lockdep_map){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: iwl_pcie_irq_rx_msix_handler+0x47/0x100 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943219] _iwl_pcie_rx_init+0x208/0x6e0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943242] iwl_pcie_gen2_rx_init+0x20/0x30 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943264] iwl_trans_pcie_gen2_start_fw+0x1e3/0x350 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943289] iwl_mvm_load_ucode_wait_alive+0xfc/0x440 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943329] iwl_run_unified_mvm_ucode+0xa5/0x250 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943360] iwl_run_init_mvm_ucode+0x292/0x370 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943391] iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x7f4/0xb60 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943424] _iwl_op_mode_start.isra.0+0x42/0x80 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943446] iwl_opmode_register+0x70/0xe0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943467] iwl_mvm_init+0x35/0x1000 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943588] _iwl_pcie_rx_init+0x140/0x6e0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943612] iwl_pcie_gen2_rx_init+0x20/0x30 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943635] iwl_trans_pcie_gen2_start_fw+0x1e3/0x350 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943662] iwl_mvm_load_ucode_wait_alive+0xfc/0x440 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943695] iwl_run_unified_mvm_ucode+0xa5/0x250 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943728] iwl_run_init_mvm_ucode+0x292/0x370 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943760] iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x7f4/0xb60 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943793] _iwl_op_mode_start.isra.0+0x42/0x80 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943816] iwl_opmode_register+0x70/0xe0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943838] iwl_mvm_init+0x35/0x1000 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.943954] iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x7c/0x8b0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.943978] iwl_pcie_napi_poll_msix+0x2a/0x90 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944063] iwl_pcie_irq_rx_msix_handler+0xbc/0x100 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944147] _iwl_pcie_rx_init+0x140/0x6e0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944170] iwl_pcie_gen2_rx_init+0x20/0x30 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944194] iwl_trans_pcie_gen2_start_fw+0x1e3/0x350 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944220] iwl_mvm_load_ucode_wait_alive+0xfc/0x440 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.944255] iwl_run_unified_mvm_ucode+0xa5/0x250 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.944287] iwl_run_init_mvm_ucode+0x292/0x370 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.944319] iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x7f4/0xb60 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.944352] _iwl_op_mode_start.isra.0+0x42/0x80 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944375] iwl_opmode_register+0x70/0xe0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944397] iwl_mvm_init+0x35/0x1000 [iwlmvm] >> [ 4.944493] ... key at: [] __key.12+0x0/0xffffffffffff0f40 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944547] iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x7c/0x8b0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944569] iwl_pcie_napi_poll_msix+0x2a/0x90 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944643] iwl_pcie_irq_rx_msix_handler+0xbc/0x100 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944705] CPU: 0 PID: 2094 Comm: irq/131-iwlwifi Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7-next-20210211+ #1 >> [ 4.944786] ? iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x7c/0x8b0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944825] ? iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x7c/0x8b0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944847] iwl_pcie_rx_handle+0x7c/0x8b0 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944878] iwl_pcie_napi_poll_msix+0x2a/0x90 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944949] ? iwl_pcie_irq_rx_msix_handler+0xab/0x100 [iwlwifi] >> [ 4.944981] iwl_pcie_irq_rx_msix_handler+0xbc/0x100 [iwlwifi] > > Thanks for reporting! > > We made a bunch of fixes in this area and Kalle just pulled them to > wireless-drivers-next. I believe these changes will be in tomorrow's > linux-next. Can you retry it then? > Thanks, I'll re-test tomorrow and let you know. > -- > Cheers, > Luca. > Heiner