Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3558074pxb; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:17:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjgwQ25qHgUGiBmBDCHc+GpxdlQFezQ9sCULpxRMRXLVhCw/3ITEI/fwwYJF518c3Rwh2H X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:aac5:: with SMTP id kt5mr10559076ejb.548.1614633459327; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:17:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614633459; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Nqlm0S5QxWiyRIzwf7FNBi+Ez2jpHCcMlMQjYDKk8LVRubvNqAtAW8eZlvaFT7KOHh D0eOmnoqT6drF9Th0zkTb3xuuKg8JWfOdambjCmyDxHWdZcFywwphvKLgExEi4Gkp9dm lL7MK5t9CN7QdcbgdlzeiR4pjHgPETZ9F50K8xl7lBTCFhGy/q5GeVSupvAS7nypobc8 cG33pNKIYIcbZyWKHZ5uM18Y4SMS8iZNPwMkS03HWyNTx55I+2lCtjBdHX5N8pkMNUvs 9/MRMuE4FhQKSsPwir/45Id6avCTZ+y+kHA2twwf/o/x7PF6JsIZe710flJ2qhWxPllI qhxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=lRjLXrdwuE6u/+3gMhX5WUYHovnrrvU3b9lOjkFvRm0=; b=C6gUVHctBdCWZeUgWMiWfbustQrLShskhdtuHFGWNSEu9m9/X5vZC5Xkzf63lcX3Eb Kdp83vzjAy0Ing8OLSlWRjZuo2lPmUR8/TrvuVXB4eRfjz5zqTPnpx3bcONpG16Pajt2 DJSvhcjKyQU7CPkvpOPJNslCdg0bnInTbRhBaDp3SHF3Qn3JoI3wiLXxVDt8/lkyvr9J qLmFEYtQEWVmw6CkI7CC6soU2OYxoQkNcTBLYFpVCafzdHvuSVJOL45xAX1mwW1bWMYO UlRdDQLo39wOUXNVXha7VPdTjIIw1Vf9NnfM3MKusSlMB8xYtWn2EQ9JVyEO/iqSMBLA S+Lw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s12si11677030edd.70.2021.03.01.13.17.10; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 13:17:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243909AbhCAVP0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:15:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41312 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237864AbhCAVN0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:13:26 -0500 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD500C061788; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:12:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lGpqH-00ARN0-Um; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 22:12:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2db8f779b4b37d4498cfeaed77d5ede54e429a6e.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: Lockdep warning in iwl_pcie_rx_handle() From: Johannes Berg To: Jiri Kosina , Luca Coelho Cc: Heiner Kallweit , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 22:12:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20210301_215846_256695_15E0D07E) References: (sfid-20210301_215846_256695_15E0D07E) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi Jiri, > I am getting the splat below with Linus' tree as of today (5.11-rc1, > fe07bfda2fb). I haven't started to look into the code yet, but apparently > this has been already reported by Heiner here: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg208353.html > > so before I start digging deep into it (the previous kernel this > particular machine had is 5.9, so I'd rather avoid lenghty bisect for now > in case someone has already looked into it and has ideas where the problem > is), I thought I'd ask whether this has been root-caused elsewhere > already. Yeah, I'm pretty sure we have a fix for this, though I'm not sure right now where it is in the pipeline. It's called "iwlwifi: pcie: don't add NAPI under rxq->lock" but right now I can't find it in any of the public archives. johannes