Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4093276pxf; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:27:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzv3jnvqPOIdWBOiNCBZx6msrdu7MVlk8c09XVrQ/0CtZAuPcpddP74Mqbg8LE5AvbeLRRN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:aac6:: with SMTP id kt6mr4013502ejb.260.1616491621338; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:27:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616491621; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SZo62uUjcoXewgow9RNLRKQfWsSeBzGFEo4L/0EftCBU6jMqmWSVdle4+X/ViuTO2q nSGa3Ce8HUeswBk+/4Lut6daS4cmeQBX1cHbH4sVnQBblYQDOx5qC9ylGQm45btGF8qw diJIXeCPrr0CL+cnvayB3ggMldXcJ+FJX2K2LTHEU3quI/jhXCy/IGnBn4G+oeUp9hkV aeB196BSIi0UsQ3kSo7d10Ayceln4gnYlOoeqPJBUxP46m9gyqnlYZ5W10wYwVORx257 GgI2fut0ckhv6G3a4eRkCH1ogPT1mcRBQcLnzJmIgyrSdn/M0H3h7shhrHQoGAQdG33D fSSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=wvtPZHtIHDr/wE1ZtDkp333/SqNv7yHQal9BLOY+poQ=; b=ohzUTfc0NHdT8JE8Bx/Szl1yGhU7wfUH6wsE8KHz3/s5Imw9uQM5MM7hpSd4hgSm/h R2xGDn9zdbeie1M7DXfuUCxPRSS8Ca3Mkj7k6zdd18zJfqY1ee77VI9YWEA5CkI6xGPd cuIakqsVLwp6DMQgLWubkRb8Izy+lBWqwKSi7y30oe7AdXWYpwq6QWSYLxMpBW/mUsfd 9HW78Q0Bc0Ib2oo9RWH9E75NwByl9xRemRLa1hkImYbCXs3ZgSGbnfY1HozGvuuLR5XJ pHPaj5WpeRdc2LiHpEMvqnVPTHxQU5rqxOiuzZ6yE5J85lkaBSn7VCATB2zZSWguCzLc bLaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=U14EQRos; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z25si5546997ejw.647.2021.03.23.02.26.37; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=U14EQRos; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229949AbhCWJZw (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 05:25:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49864 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229730AbhCWJZU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 05:25:20 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93CD961984; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:25:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1616491520; bh=agXZtvq6Q8ZPuuNsJqhZhVpGpj8pmEWrHa3JhHpdN9A=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=U14EQRosIOb3kEOxTuF6rb2WZnb4my1o0nmWIt03KotoD8Cw2gz+yaJyB3D8y0Gih XxliVJc9tSRejjS/owU8aiW3oHDexn7URBkBycmrtRr9ztYu+7dL2ctkOMIGmObpMw 2uBcCw8WZFmQOX+5N5RUpxSjdnBgm56C7g5bpI0922k21nHh66fPATnhOXMqIjgAq1 DP6wajk7s1e6zPeAGhZwIdMH2xSNsPbOkAP047npsAujUhxHe3myKGdo4zNl2o3UiW 70CalNDZS0+M+HeVldCS/JHMOaAG3BVXdSikBZFelIQTrENcC2BSw3C5QozJEio9Fx MRJG7FXq7KOWQ== Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:25:16 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina To: Sedat Dilek cc: Luca Coelho , Kalle Valo , Johannes Berg , Emmanuel Grumbach , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Murphy Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87h7lfbowr.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net> <87zgz7t246.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > > > > > > Johannes is telling me that he merged this patch internally, but I have no > > > > > > > > idea what is happening to it ... ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reported splat is a clear bug, so it should be fixed one way or the > > > > > > > > other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should I take this to wireless-drivers? > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't speak for the maintainers, but as far as I am concerned, it > > > > > > definitely is a 5.12 material, as it fixes real scheduling bug. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, please take this to w-d. We have a similar patch internally, but > > > > > there's a backlog and it will take me some time to get to it. I'll > > > > > resolve eventual conflicts when time comes. > > > > > > > > Ok, can I have your ack for patchwork? > > > > > > Sorry, forgot that. > > > > > > Acked-by: Luca Coelho > > > > Sorry for sounding like broken record :) but this fix is still not in any > > tree as far as I can tell. And it's fixing real scheduling in atomic bug. > > > > Thanks, > > > > [ CC Chris Murphy ] > > A week ago Chris sent an email to linux-wireless with pointing to: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212297 > > AFAICS, that is the same bug. Indeed, it is. Chris, if you want to provide your Tested-by:, the (yet unmerged) patch to test can be found here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/nycvar.YFH.7.76.2103021125430.12405@cbobk.fhfr.pm/ -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs