Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:17d3:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hz19csp291058pxb; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:56:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGAj548H0x87BkPdJrSC8N8LoQxfMo/+aB6Iyw9i/cQDEYiQeFIa4owgt8TJe2nErKvOvm X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3507:: with SMTP id ls7mr9356173pjb.172.1618577819229; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:56:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1618577819; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sKJfLYAP2xCnTDRZGVJjHJgvtT7ElJo9nuO7ma4Z4lq8vDuhfmn1ZoUktrfzhb04gl 7jaYTk1GAwc7EdpV/rgd2TfaVF66l7lZH6bphtHqtdJQq4kIusBHPYT9NNKqytigvK9k ZMQTeCj0zePCMW5cWb9sd0xIY8m8JyqhklSdDGZTihH8kDrnZsTET5b9gLR7/4enk1jH Bnitd8Fv64/kS2EjhZlFQ0QZiQr9aGXkzgLKjrDGdtuP05lUaG8MB+6guJ1EXiv2ti4N XYf0wTyHWLPVfWNaHRQkmIoaQzQFxLHvy3MLRBzVSIcTX/RdRDD5wuaNcVBmHpn7ULkM smlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=GS4ToV5E6dghYVJzyGzgURMr14Yx6ZBvyTw6j+N6YnY=; b=hoMC2bfCAp6YG+e+CeL4/PuiQEyAxIKdANNzMMtawzhLFEsrh93IPwiaWc1pB6CGtr JNYyNqf3IFFOwUpB2wngN5C429ISH/1QJmEXGKhUcmYtko0Pn7Yt1WTEEVUpH4g6Lxjt ek43gJYvnEcYuOmIT2HwdE+cGnI6GyZ9peAyByrmdcV3tGLZjA1q0xomqxWZJzZAmD1g sdpVsebikfiK/ea/O+1y3fn3utFtmukZ1LrmpU90Rs52o+QJZdBuoKgSMgMNAjQyVNJz fz2//4hnRgpk6OvAK6AUBqYcuznsXr+HGrsIVkYviYRJ5Xs2YtfBBrk9ucPnSVrW1UkV MRbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PrN2MWSs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a6si4961055pfi.169.2021.04.16.05.56.43; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PrN2MWSs; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235376AbhDPMuK (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:50:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:37586 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234312AbhDPMuK (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:50:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618577385; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GS4ToV5E6dghYVJzyGzgURMr14Yx6ZBvyTw6j+N6YnY=; b=PrN2MWSsztEjRFFpzMI3+lcjrYNzEQ0ZDBqVS6MNXCmrAPxIxi5f4VI2J9lYs0a38lL2rE FbobaTRhoNSLRqflSxGXUZBwv88lTkLrKFbcAUTULAXbXdiyiYCUVrQG3lMaXfYtdI9UhN Qr12huCmWdiX5s93gGiLk8LIyY5jfjo= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-574-LKpaqcvaNv6rncsNOIk8IA-1; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:49:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: LKpaqcvaNv6rncsNOIk8IA-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id k5-20020a1709061c05b029037cb8a99e03so1962562ejg.16 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:49:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GS4ToV5E6dghYVJzyGzgURMr14Yx6ZBvyTw6j+N6YnY=; b=CfUzUVkoYuqmujGYkRgag06FH+tN2eBkjcRtO7mI9RacOAUdOdRvMwbjGhRb/agE4i OMclMLL30zGve4kQ3YzFbNCRFX6aKsB237aFhDn7oAfsJvvZCY17UurxXBwXW773jcBp 4BkiS6ad3JgvfaqZtaaf9r1inYWe1A5CPFljtfMvYp7kmm1kAWWDST/K8TPiaAxfz+xY 4/v/XEB828Gz/Wv3EDWPGE1K42rVCq1Tvsb6vZsy2J6HCXNhgiwwJK5offVBytaCJcIY 76UJ8+xwF/MvCcCF+IPbuZi6fQ5SgWO2g679A1Rb28LMNKIRVv6hAi9oObBhV4SHTrBy D9qA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323b08JOJwpl7uT158qYO6bjHTiHRDqyrmS6TmMbu9YC2EPkjui 7QN8bv1QoKeKpjkBGApLffBMZ9+4BLNwobmkMmM6vdV0Hgep3EoJUlsvWGNryBTc+SY9tVJi5Lk uLl+//jerU8r55RP2uB8gGa+WUBQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:51d0:: with SMTP id r16mr6384406edd.52.1618577382562; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:51d0:: with SMTP id r16mr6384397edd.52.1618577382354; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk ([45.145.92.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kj24sm4201875ejc.49.2021.04.16.05.49.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D02E1806B2; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:49:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: properly process TXQ management frames In-Reply-To: <20210416134702.ef8486a64293.If0a9025b39c71bb91b11dd6ac45547aba682df34@changeid> References: <20210416134702.ef8486a64293.If0a9025b39c71bb91b11dd6ac45547aba682df34@changeid> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:49:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg3qgzrv.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Johannes Berg writes: > From: Johannes Berg > > My previous commit to not apply flow control to management frames > that are going over TXQs (which is currently only the case for > iwlwifi, I think) broke things, with iwlwifi firmware crashing on > certain frames. As it turns out, that was due to the frame being > too short: space for the MIC wasn't added at the end of encrypted > management frames. > > Clearly, this is due to using the 'frags' queue - this is meant > only for frames that have already been processed for TX, and the > code in ieee80211_tx_dequeue() just returns them. This caused all > management frames to now not get any TX processing. > > To fix this, use IEEE80211_TX_INTCFL_NEED_TXPROCESSING (which is > currently used only in other circumstances) to indicate that the > frames need processing, and clear it immediately after so that, > at least in theory, MMPDUs can be fragmented. > > Fixes: 73bc9e0af594 ("mac80211: don't apply flow control on management fr= ames") > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Acked-by: Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen