Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210412124328.24472-1-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <20210420172755.12178-1-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210420172755.12178-1-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
From:   Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 08:49:06 +0300
Message-ID: <CANUX_P0enDyHC_j9s2+w-a+mJgE4NqK=soBfbBLb+iA3O-42dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mei: bus: add client dma interface
To:     Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
        "Coelho, Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:29 PM Emmanuel Grumbach
<emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
>
> Expose the client dma mapping via mei client bus interface.
> The client dma has to be mapped before the device is enabled,
> therefore we need to create device linking already during mapping
> and we need to unmap after the client is disable hence we need to
> postpone the unlink and flush till unmapping or when
> destroying the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> ---
> This is a another version of the patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210206144325.25682-6-tomas.winkler@intel.com/
>
> Greg asked to route this patch through the wireless drivers tree:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YB6sIi61X5p6Dq6y@kroah.com/
> So here it is.
> ---

I think I fixed all the issues you raised on the previous version of the patch.
This series has been reviewed internally as well. The merge window is
now closed, can we move forward with this?

Thanks.