Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1912638pxj; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 02:35:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrKbjC154DOtScWbxqETbEDdRkF3qLUaS6b88YWoxtvI6bbTCumiUJ2cpFrNHimro/wwZZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7b9e:: with SMTP id ne30mr11006295ejc.389.1623576914653; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 02:35:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623576914; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LqYgub7FOsz3qR+nfLFpAIwFEtTXl/IXZ/zFOWKvfpRUatC8Wxm6Fz74qFm7RLysd+ YNdIxT4lIlVcimntcV/8IHCwWberfvAH/ZgPp6AVGFCWD+PlXqL2gEhGRViwuhfOtCys J9aTKgjOvRwj86R/+vSLlTBvEuDeG4NvDqw4T6O/6USTr0vF5rXSSchFYK3PIsW6RzUX OI15FHHkg0jIA3R20hPi9bsBFbZ7y0e5avkl1nplirSTPi6Z2Ib8dTDMC+iFywaQd6NB OJsu0107cLwYyap2sZCaxfs6TGdUJ19eb7exMYC8Kkcx0w0Wo5jb9JWI9VAI14vlp64D Bq5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:reply-to :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:to:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=kXu0ZkdSLyVjOlphVreWhdeDA/Vpu2xsRBgVsgVowlg=; b=tVz7hmCYGSjUV2AZf9UYgKTZSX4GZKMG2w8y+382ngmk5QtG6ePpMK68nDnkXMngM1 tuRFxov1i7ZGvP9QEuLG4zErU5dEUp+3gXscx1d77PyOi6fXsCQJi4xbVxhEEEhzcNcf SN5bojkCdOCuPWLhB4bNuodoQg3AAzDrZDS2HUVhEfVbQte8ar3ejDh5j/U0NoC7rqnK LzgpcxMXWWmosGoh34lt76BIEhaCHWfzGGzz8lwMBFFGMH0W4u3Ldrx0CddZhhE85ZvY SVio4b0NVx8ST6QxQG4WrVu/z1yvzEtfpFPu21RkgHhoofrVoIHrZzpYw6ekHfCgVoIg 6GVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=l5Tk9JD3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u16si9530023edb.334.2021.06.13.02.34.47; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 02:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=l5Tk9JD3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231424AbhFMJgJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 05:36:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48442 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230255AbhFMJgJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 05:36:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2C2C061574 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 02:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id i94so10927180wri.4 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 02:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kXu0ZkdSLyVjOlphVreWhdeDA/Vpu2xsRBgVsgVowlg=; b=l5Tk9JD3R3ocPN5jPFXEj6s+RrMasX8bcrx2PLTcNUT1O6drLlDNLZocJxVxqot/n9 gpHf+8HZSMmfhdlYfVQKiomCSy4/M+iTeTlQ5195RNVeCvwKM/NdASSXat9pdY1rJsRr hMZ4l0l+C1mOV6//iulhgHoh8pR3Mr8fH0DmC5Nb63lM/3gFEbWHlohYNm92BcknbKfl Jk084n7Rw0F3ieZwnVYVlKgqXqUK4BzJh95YchMduE5ERg5HUb/eBME8lUcgT58E43uj hOi93VOnmsbVrqLjTo5lenGZ5maYhU5AkeCVnLBuDY+u8kKN2YrbCBWnTCguuq9IJ2OH b7dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kXu0ZkdSLyVjOlphVreWhdeDA/Vpu2xsRBgVsgVowlg=; b=S+leTy0DRh9uM7zFurwIrUdeoHDfHqYffRcPj1aTuSBnwgNu3YCFQ5rtaM/u38WeVU 1HiyQBIdJ4PVQg9+b+QjTvZKzxAJJV3+1b62arsBKN8MxrI8Lpr3iKC9HR8PlDVnqOKi kE9UGWu96WeUsO4d84CoeRw0Xrb3sIn9BYU6lsorwZvyOiIUU5gUWUSKV17TKm/PjSqK 5VcWwYuo69260YClwUczLo5eFsUaflEe1ypuNYMwjgJYcqL9zkBmEhV78D5ba4J6t4Sd tgvDuHoWgaCKKaF8ehmAYMDNVShkTrvXsKPIEg2L1u/aY3pdq0bR+HaA4S0YzPZBea7Y IMHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ppM272aZNrmUbEWzIpPtu/NXbny6k5fDUdLw4QzIrX1JbTJXy eLZtyGAuz2ITyM2MHaGFd631gqrEP4JLeg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:444e:: with SMTP id x14mr13533199wrr.200.1623576831441; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 02:33:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ptb (static-188-208-229-77.ipcom.comunitel.net. [77.229.208.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s62sm17724538wms.13.2021.06.13.02.33.51 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 02:33:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Breuer X-Google-Original-From: Peter Breuer Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 10:33:47 +0100 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ipw2200 driver no longer sets encrypted WEP in ipw2200 device? Message-ID: <20210613103347.0c2148bd@ptb> In-Reply-To: <20210610131139.4fce5404@ptb> References: <20210610131139.4fce5404@ptb> Reply-To: Peter.T.Breuer@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org This list is so offically dead! Still, I have a clue for you: On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:11:39 +0100 Peter Breuer wrote: > Hello - has somebody disabled encrypted WEP in ipw2200 firmwares, or > done something global that would have an equivalent effect, perhaps Same issue with WPA1 or 2. Plaintext is OK except the signal keeps dropping, and the same is true even from my modern mobile phone. The clue is this note from TP-Link: https://www.tp-link.com/en/support/faq/2303/ TP-Link has officially begun to launch our 802.11AX class wireless routers. However, some Intel WLAN adapters with old driver can't detect the wireless signal of our routers. Please upgrade the driver of your WLAN card to the latest if you have this issue. Intel has also released a FAQ for its compatibility issue: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000054799/network-and-i-o/wireless-networking.html I imagine the issue is broad (TP-Link would downplay it) and might be a major messup. Blame Intel for not predicting your future mistake , would you .. heh heh and see what happens. Has anything of these Intel driver changes made it into a recent kernel? See where brand loyalty gets you ... PTB