Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f3d0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp409712pxv; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3XSv9WLz/Ct8v4sNVaMh2HlChP+jrUVD5VyEGUqwvRFt/jIEOb/dwEU58qbDZ2cw8ocsv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:348b:: with SMTP id v11mr44659663edc.231.1625066325158; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1625066325; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rv3JDkysO78RM1EPDpXQsaT4Y+2QhlmyGviV2+UKCBgmxbHFlA5WZyIGfZQNw9Qkpa 3oaq/P8wcuERN5xZS+AWy/hdVSSBrZrjRGbtNlV/Iwg1ujuJ4hCNoGUjT2/ZZCYMSQKv yDrD4djpIGesIzvalsr8If0mv8kapWS63ppIHQsu7dtWxKnITTIMUVct4OiGHxGCyl3m NF6fz+Zqj1fS3noNwS0X+i8/rqfgPpbIXYq0aGmHiFASVhcTnGVDhFMHKqTw0olN5pMk kck9Ppbd2KSxpH+THbz7F0CDgH9pOg6FgvM3bksyLjTG81CHr8pzE4C0CCywbuomPrer 6oTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=9Si4/3mbVmM5VJxy6bW+MVjJGaS3XheqtQW8xlZqafc=; b=wEMGAliOBm+g2LjrqC6fTuxfTJPcUifEj7xJIhEBXC7QxXlh7t+HScjqLq8Zo5dIs9 kNgQPtZQ5k1FT8Sw/pjkhI5Wz3qoY5t+tFjgG+J25m+CIQGR3m0+0vgGZRUwmTIUZRuf CuL6Am71rAermPkhEb0Ugwc7Nyu9vj/sSzZ2faGpPcV93yiIeb8GBj9GTCtsPeLuJIUU 05vlUwWKA03ImxdnsgpD848whOIyEPQFzyq6DZkyDLmc4ON1FsqRXGJDpF4oyqX3lK4V p1xEqKfGLaPLtl9ASNuRwTUQN2hS88tcqrwvK0bJfWbtSykUkr/dTj7x3it0YpdHbchM oCEA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lVdn7Lp4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si19977965ejh.116.2021.06.30.08.18.13; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lVdn7Lp4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235534AbhF3PUU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:20:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37760 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235466AbhF3PUU (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:20:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08240C061756 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id a5-20020a7bc1c50000b02901e3bbe0939bso1912163wmj.0 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:17:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Si4/3mbVmM5VJxy6bW+MVjJGaS3XheqtQW8xlZqafc=; b=lVdn7Lp4EpNU4LT33sKXscSBPErMV2XKU55z4P8urc0t8YbcEm9qsxXySDVbd6Jhpi /M0XOy/ykjXbK5sqj+hEPevj8mggSJdX9Src2vwXYC0si+/hlcUZ5JvsZgarDw+fqhMw dLI487lcNJnd0tqiDx4Wb1VxUR5NQ3qU0OiiVxxikSwkGNSrKfeKe988Mrombfgwra2I AeKP8syWoRt7lBYBZN7fnMckNW1F4gaoq2ZicmdTzSCZoQjwKQBakRaTf3Q535ycAbri yhdI6EWrwdprIjGMiKZy9dMMpl4toYpecYuMyeuFf7S7A1P3EHt0IOIflloO2rSSDQin FBiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Si4/3mbVmM5VJxy6bW+MVjJGaS3XheqtQW8xlZqafc=; b=WC/AdiU6TZy1EWvenadr4sCgPQz0c64cGCpYRIXNGn7TsyVj7cLJfQuw9eAtpTBPWW ZW4TWdQRKnlRK68S119oSVJ39/ykkh7TPttrIe8XHFR9GMMokXSCmPMZaTecOSsmCc4y W1TJ3nHwvq2q5Ncv3py4VJqhiadvtQ0iyBRvyfE8cmT1CiL6RN0hSBlDZM0Yh1bqoM79 2w47ux+UCxviAAVYiT/cF2DBaLANrBR8wIRMBMoBJyd5sSSKuhuSOR7KaQHbJ9NjcE/J PdtdgnEWNPVGuzJzczFDDsNCRwuGWP7goS4cmFX4Bs2VYteUlGKOLRvdP2mlzSjpR2VC 1dbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OYsXxGENyDc6gS2mfHJ25SIZmM3nWkyIrkPoXulMXi1+F8d8R CB/ukewWQlNmgFSVdEV6QiNR1jp+elRVXflYmlEZRam87j4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f56:: with SMTP id m22mr5372469wmq.16.1625066268617; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: b.K.il.h.u+tigbuh@gmail.com Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:17:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: recent FCC report and order allows 5850-5895 immediately To: Seth Forshee Cc: wireless-regdb , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 5:47 PM Seth Forshee = wrote: > I think we concluded previously that both 5730-5850 and 5850-5895 should > have a max bandwidth of 160 MHz to permit use of 160 MHz across these > channels. > Yes. > We also discussed using NO-IR for 5850-5895. The regulations forbid > active scans, and PMTP-ONLY does not prevent them. NO-IR appears to be > the only option which conforms to this restriction, though that will > also block running an AP in this range. > So we would not be able to operate an OpenWrt or other Linux-based AP, while other vendors would be allowed to do this? How is this acceptable? How does this help in liberating the band? > I also read the max EIRP for clients as 30 dBm without any TPC > requirement. Did I overlook something which limits the EIRP to 27 dBm? > The 27 dBm EIRP is needed for 20 MHz operation due to spectral density requirements. Is my information correct that regdb has no notion of specifying a separate limit for spectral density? (If it did, we might be able to double the EIRP for 2.4GHz of 10MHz channels) I have summarized the reasoning in a comment of the original patch, but let me cite it here then (copied from the more recent link you have now given): > "(iii) For client devices operating under the control of an indoor access= point in the 5.850-5.895 GHz band, the maximum power spectral density must= not exceed 14 dBm e.i.r.p. in any 1-megahertz band, and the maximum e.i.r.= p. over the frequency band of operation must not exceed 30 dBm." > "the Commission limited indoor access point EIRP spectral density to 20 d= Bm/MHz with a maximum EIRP of 36 dBm over the bandwidth of operation (e.g.,= 33 dBm/20 MHz and 36 dBm/40 MHz)" > "To keep the potential for causing harmful interference low, the Commissi= on required client devices to operate under the control of an access point,= and limited client device's power spectral density and maximum transmit po= wer to 6 dB below the power permitted for the access point."