Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/64] lib: Introduce CONFIG_TEST_MEMCPY
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
        Keith Packard <keithpac@amazon.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
References: <20210727205855.411487-1-keescook@chromium.org>
 <20210727205855.411487-34-keescook@chromium.org>
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Message-ID: <9827144a-dacf-61dc-d554-6c69434708de@acm.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:31:03 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210727205855.411487-34-keescook@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 7/27/21 1:58 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> +static int __init test_memcpy_init(void)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	err |= test_memcpy();
> +	err |= test_memmove();
> +	err |= test_memset();
> +
> +	if (err) {
> +		pr_warn("FAIL!\n");
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +	} else {
> +		pr_info("all tests passed\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit test_memcpy_exit(void)
> +{ }
> +
> +module_init(test_memcpy_init);
> +module_exit(test_memcpy_exit);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Has it been considered to implement this test using the Kunit framework?

Thanks,

Bart.