Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp248497pxt; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 21:41:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXkmNEzwWl+AN6s1OvGBEPhAZlYBuisW66+P3Cpi6dQKmVlC+3I0P+pvT0kjdo3b3D8/kX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:40d5:: with SMTP id a21mr2812822ejk.325.1628138503196; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:41:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628138503; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ptbhnsiEMq2XRf46Nb0sMoTVKq2H9Kf0w60S3edRG+lUqW87aEjdQCzBLcGN3oY3W4 fSVC9vxhLtclde70aXbvHeyASUy9klPcxvSXy8pp0i0/nUskRcKPUfbfSVjr4xSR4kdG huvXa2iTHUXUiBeWq76TzwachXdCfDAz46xWx3k5NaCRgOZJ3D88TOGFTA0cpDAQ1OI4 HfT0IMISzHIv5l4/D4tTgINaai8KTtdM292jKwlmigtS0YtvCwxOQrixddyWT/YRzy4o FdcCfxyPBfSSM5tWvSh7c3R+SnfJV2jGOKyV71SlMXffWrEhYtWvTU6UtiwzSfB8STEX t2Hg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=AjXSLkd7H7YYDtJulH4krIQq1Y0iBImwf2ezdniIkdA=; b=CJVM0kKETpDDG6thsUZpO2uyzZ4QOKbQvWfPZnq5bfrugoAe+nES0LwI0/bFh463qj 2MxeIfBHMZeArYpKU4y+8LjqCpdBPdlRolL5et/59j7xZK4QOg94pVy/NTqvnvAa3jZb 2kcnpHm7jCkQVODEu7DQG3mZ/IAFJ4fmwu9SjW3ija148TwnwHpDNR95os4nfhvRiMPO zYU2OAW33hkMkg5eyEo+V+P6X9vnic9UjaJ74YP8D7WaxejfvIPeyM5Ku+Y+WCU3PIhi UglJ8pPdPS2zvVGEBXs1rR8/f+b17q5026BQ3qkzrBd0RXoxYLSOcb3xo0xZf1IlXGnx 68Ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=sHJcB4jX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ca21si4524012ejb.437.2021.08.04.21.41.20; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 21:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=sHJcB4jX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237668AbhHEBfX (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 21:35:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36398 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234640AbhHEBfW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 21:35:22 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 654E8C061765 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 18:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id m9so4853745ljp.7 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:35:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AjXSLkd7H7YYDtJulH4krIQq1Y0iBImwf2ezdniIkdA=; b=sHJcB4jXI1zcgqPOZbIRAPp1vjrO3w4XLO+80yQ1MuSzVrAV1xXi4+raix9RC4NhxR U5NGLYnBmO98IShasDNXUY7XCt02jwep11JHfp9yDdK2Eg9rUiv1b5cMFXGwZUN6mnih Gr0jul6O94GONM1N3GP2bbkBnqwI5MaWXW9EFM4euqjtgRfvjmFPB66ll06X7Cf07c4s uFxxwc8uyVPKRPN/Dz8LzXKbiGSPeOEVC87x3UBHIBpShnrjhhHwJgBt2v1otbyfGyh4 ebJOkkxwL4VnvIcSzcEpMtIyjjrsJpgno2wWvtQk4a1nlM+q/2cQtZG7iS1vvW48Br2d /PYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AjXSLkd7H7YYDtJulH4krIQq1Y0iBImwf2ezdniIkdA=; b=WRMJsT5mrNuG9Dy69/1/c14/9NbIlTE2IcQRHpyUrtRLY5HAIrwmy2fGvZTxMm393n r2wCk8EhkeytocY9XXaz6lYH4bO2HdIAopyUqoodYybeCsQYFjSv6ZuJWtbWkfQF4Fwl P0CuIAC21y48+JRkUzaaDECP07QE3N+3H1y1+dRjWYlT584cmuzjfVtsq0UoT7Hi+vIb dMk4v31VROzrrhkceSe99KZE6JSJraFdTyt5I84CsjXk2/2pfFRjq70urZBNvjuf9in7 dqumOrKK9TMzhMdtZD974rKWd5EOSU5vb3M877yNNuveIXOI2zrX15jlhAL4nrGc5Klz 3+cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MlNrYAHh6J8yCljYDKyRr0SRlj9VjXnRuUwa9062Z/oNldt0r vhe4ySU8HhbfH5DGXRLV6ss= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:85d7:: with SMTP id h23mr1357805ljj.329.1628127306755; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.145] (46-138-65-182.dynamic.spd-mgts.ru. [46.138.65.182]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm280964ljj.121.2021.08.04.18.35.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] brcmfmac: firmware: Fix firmware loading To: Linus Walleij , Arend van Spriel , Franky Lin , Hante Meuleman , Chi-hsien Lin , Wright Feng , Chung-hsien Hsu , Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hansson , Arend van Spriel References: <20210804153434.3429348-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> From: Dmitry Osipenko Message-ID: <74e24409-aeb2-5297-6888-7af2b1126ccd@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 04:35:05 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210804153434.3429348-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org 04.08.2021 18:34, Linus Walleij пишет: > + bool tested_board_variant; What about s/tested/tried/? > void (*done)(struct device *dev, int err, struct brcmf_fw_request *req); > }; > > -static void brcmf_fw_request_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx); > - > #ifdef CONFIG_EFI > /* In some cases the EFI-var stored nvram contains "ccode=ALL" or "ccode=XV" > * to specify "worldwide" compatible settings, but these 2 ccode-s do not work > @@ -638,11 +637,25 @@ static int brcmf_fw_request_firmware(const struct firmware **fw, > return request_firmware(fw, cur->path, fwctx->dev); > } > > -static void brcmf_fw_request_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) > +static void brcmf_fw_request_done_first(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx) Is it really worthwhile to rename this function? There is no "done_second".