Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp2551405pxt; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 03:23:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxt+7ooxRt5UOBOf8iYGYBDZCQTMu5kXgTaRI7at4SJJgAtDvsIP4CHiHXcFti128/JbxQR X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c7c2:: with SMTP id o2mr28937574eds.166.1628504639431; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 03:23:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628504639; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FNULPK63rDeUk0zgfQ+mENSKuzQxWiN3Ls8DxZoYwqCyOSjTxKiRLA6XhKEsZTdKC4 FezU9PO8IByYlXFROslleJfCQVhpdXSfOnBzL/Fi/Lpo8wjawCe5PXNqtSp3D/sDB28A y2TdRIqrxKsQ0v1yF9FAtnoJ8R9WQW/rQS/07vmCWNvLZaBrpBUFO213H426siGg2MNP 1uGTzupm7YmPeAtwPgOv2ZXp7aHBwc1Z1o010ojF1OYXv9Tp/RmEqPbJ3uCu90NPOT2y tPBO5mAIOheoltIYWn/+w9bEC0/TL9VYCw2OdgMWOglOxH5tt/hlptht9lqWHJQsT8iS 04qg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:cc:to:subject:reply-to :from:date:dkim-signature; bh=zMMvPYXCWwg1ECXuJ65Ce2QQL+GNmPxWmXQL8VjJT+A=; b=acVaA2xD88TS+AGwAy7XT6Ad/1W1yecq8jnXduaSOAej7k76DtoWi/lfevRgs+ZHcC pPZ/XUME1buWddLIAdZpFbq13ZgaDBMJHu2n/gp4YSu9m2xSbb0cnJGFjc+XD7LGXd24 uPc9VxQy2ug/UFJB1u1a8/OeJvOVc/wKUaWvWZIhIfUVU1FPKGw1ifAOj3USs62hmN87 pqf5CXZ141QQjKK0hbiQPMtES0KLPI+xW22Ml1i7ieohvUR7dwgDY/k3HNSNsGHEXM2F MCi/0HgTz3P4QNBv28a0ofpyv2/F5v/OQH6eN5mDu/ueBiNyZovuOq13CMCizYphz6r3 uLgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ixit.cz header.s=dkim header.b=howMU3VF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=ixit.cz Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b12si16916258edd.560.2021.08.09.03.23.30; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 03:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ixit.cz header.s=dkim header.b=howMU3VF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=ixit.cz Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233290AbhHIJwc (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:52:32 -0400 Received: from ixit.cz ([94.230.151.217]:45390 "EHLO ixit.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232944AbhHIJwb (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 05:52:31 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.138] (ixit.cz [94.230.151.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ixit.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 010922029F; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:52:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ixit.cz; s=dkim; t=1628502729; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type; bh=zMMvPYXCWwg1ECXuJ65Ce2QQL+GNmPxWmXQL8VjJT+A=; b=howMU3VFC/t653oHDrbc9ZILio1UPU+Z1yl3/1JY3PGCRGCy9IbsCRLWrayvM02TYCZaZM m7P3PfTT+5FcjDnGL9l1VIEA/SMw8lsE8sxphkAGMYJ2Q7FMkI3fvaXupq10Q8nvpaby0K NBqjWP5KzA6wlVl8zJEMZXDz85wA4bg= Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:51:03 +0200 From: David Heidelberg Reply-To: 1608618887-8857-1-git-send-email-miaoqing@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: fix wmi mgmt tx queue full due to race condition To: miaoqing@codeaurora.org, briannorris@chromium.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <3PGKXQ.OUNHZGPTI7091@ixit.cz> X-Mailer: geary/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hello all, since I noticed this issue is very common (at least for me and some others) on 4.14 kernels [1] [2] would you think that backporting this patch into stable would make sense? I assume that at some point it could help some OpenWRT/LEDE and other devices (since for Turris it'll be most likely backported anyway). Thank you for the working on this! David [1] https://forum.turris.cz/t/5-2-4-patch-wifi-fails-after-while-wmi-mgmt-tx-queue-is-full/15510 [2] https://forum.turris.cz/t/unstable-wifi-on-mox-b/11065/