Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp2983923pxt; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwppwLAntGRS24Q4IPdrwIFDvYdMs3r6aD/rk3aLdeSsMpKVzwUX9hkKSxyrNNl/OU0efEX X-Received: by 2002:a92:6610:: with SMTP id a16mr122761ilc.71.1628542185045; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628542185; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iwdRhcrwcL7SSxlamjXlbrb91Op8anNKaAveRJ6vmVSP2DiMLN4bGTUEsOCGt0Qcuh XCxWQ0JcB8Pzr+6u8Ffml0SAOjYwro8Dr35hW7kc2qJ+ggl5L7iJxWsykByLK5/niSeV Ef30ISI4wu9vasX/QPMZt0nKPSpIx0GaBgBdAiIQCzWvdbpsfRlKEoCo93SD1BIulB0Y qxT8fadlNkhpxsJEV3NEaPTWUk4WztliIpmbMheYb/TLwVfc0os97EirO66E/2OOFjMB iHBa87UPJ9kMCL9lcZ1uy1taWMofcOZAggT/jsyYu3lnpg4fL3vhdDL/JUZp+J0iL9A7 GO5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id :cc:to:subject:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=EwEcJ1rbb/Lvh6mB9DNV1T4J84NctEuqSvvbEiPFkGw=; b=xia4DL8hLYXGhvKZXpOnw/uTPP0E7pS5uqfs+Fdi+zFMQw3iRCnso/t1QKNUEz+sUq cjOvIFwPiwAVaXafteRKWeM3Mmox7Ds8i+4UoZIPqeGQap4Gpk4ob2X2NfNT3KHD8PyE vVtGQXakSh7+dtAvuCsiGSqkdwln8ihCQxIToWy+ew8Ode3JLK6gP23jE9dg8yOyAf3e OEnTggXAbvNj9o9YAz2llJ0vQ4etMyf8tweKDyOt3F+J0lSxQBgPeK5l+hbXtpon26VE E+4SGuez8EjtXq/cZDt/oYTQponThHn4o4mLJPJsrVx86VD8MCts/ffjAz1ZmY1wnHnD 2qew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ixit.cz header.s=dkim header.b=1L9BD9Kj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=ixit.cz Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n19si19338875ioh.29.2021.08.09.13.49.27; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ixit.cz header.s=dkim header.b=1L9BD9Kj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=ixit.cz Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235097AbhHITmH (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:42:07 -0400 Received: from ixit.cz ([94.230.151.217]:45932 "EHLO ixit.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233165AbhHITmG (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 15:42:06 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.138] (ixit.cz [94.230.151.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ixit.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 868532029F; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 21:41:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ixit.cz; s=dkim; t=1628538104; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EwEcJ1rbb/Lvh6mB9DNV1T4J84NctEuqSvvbEiPFkGw=; b=1L9BD9Kjr1QgaF4331h4EchLUl/vBObQ9UlEPsWyZL3boHzPktY4BGoHNsdto2X3VVPiQF TeLw2bPYBevvr2ClbZ/V7XkgtF+eXK+1qjWQbgnQlj+KT4L4Sp9rldvvL/UoF2bYvucQvO wIHqiju1Ejik45YICX7mqiORji6PBDI= Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 21:40:38 +0200 From: David Heidelberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: fix wmi mgmt tx queue full due to race condition To: Brian Norris Cc: Miaoqing Pan , Kalle Valo , linux-wireless Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <3PGKXQ.OUNHZGPTI7091@ixit.cz> X-Mailer: geary/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Thank you, you're right, I messed up Reply-to. I'll follow the Option 2. Thank you Best regards David Heidelberg On Mon, Aug 9 2021 at 12:01:45 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > (NB: I think your Reply-To header was wrong, so I've chosen to modify > that in hopes of actually reaching you.) > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:52 AM David Heidelberg wrote: >> since I noticed this issue is very common (at least for me and some >> others) on 4.14 kernels [1] [2] would you think that backporting >> this >> patch into stable would make sense? I assume that at some point it >> could help some OpenWRT/LEDE and other devices (since for Turris >> it'll >> be most likely backported anyway). >> >> Thank you for the working on this! >> David >> >> [1] >> >> https://forum.turris.cz/t/5-2-4-patch-wifi-fails-after-while-wmi-mgmt-tx-queue-is-full/15510 >> [2] https://forum.turris.cz/t/unstable-wifi-on-mox-b/11065/ > > Seems reasonable to me. The right way to submit such a request is > documented here: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html > > Because this wasn't identified as a -stable candidate when first > submitted, you'll need either Option 2 or Option 3. > > Regards, > Brian