Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id dn13csp610971pxb; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:20:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxZA9OZ729ZXaGHdYXve6W7Hso5DnYIYAnYWQNFV2EYXwgebecNnR6dVFt/NkHmje40VBR X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:551:: with SMTP id k17mr1479422eja.391.1628846429863; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:20:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628846429; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Qkx4sTB0QyTdITWyt+eHJfy55kLfjKcXL5yo97vhlAHYFw5vDym2a/aGAnNYkAw1nD NaIYFNIxOyqlwvyRb50tLen2LCibes6hwk2BkjVCmzfp2lqn7ICTEsDsYn5DbUbitWfl vSh6t95WtkLhf4C5XBp79bNsxKvCk/ynxBTm6G32dGSjXGs7yYF6SYrLYc1Oc+YyraOl NcZBBqp+ps8/FZ85cjDfJripRPEH1tHh9TuzDZ9w/cKRNCUmt3o+yx55g+YK6J7+Lun7 wn9WscYAVVJKlXizpOzFzomiIS+RD99E4ner1lNYt3DCtW/FeognVonqVW4H/4o3NTe9 QKtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :sender:dkim-signature; bh=fx6grdp4Bl6eyW5Q7Xj5xAn+VMkAsb769KNlsKMiU7o=; b=ehgNhTSy436jmd2GABzTlVoO1jtCJwD1mozyEo8NYAtCxv4CDsbFLXmGUvHNoZ5GkE NJX48Ceg4km2QgxRskR3oGdB82RBOyO0qMCwImy/hwsr7c98Bzn+DNByg53vgzCmKsRu v1wAjr/Qs1d98CllMSq5t9lgD/QQjXKt73ucSZ6yrh8uhwc4DAUKtYHVoxojpFuyciD5 1qAWcU8Md8ttMShhly/gNRhueXF2zcidDSJwTRJAI5wq2KcAzaOB127VCcWOL8Nh6G2V PKMUPHq9Yk+ZpZ/831F7FvsvN7oO3wnHNNuJ1sjmedgABa+XqSCuUUWEWQvNMCXWHJ1q k1ww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=CZEKdxnj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b2si1048721edy.436.2021.08.13.02.20.01; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=CZEKdxnj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239443AbhHMJRW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 05:17:22 -0400 Received: from m43-7.mailgun.net ([69.72.43.7]:52842 "EHLO m43-7.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238823AbhHMJRU (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 05:17:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1628846214; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=fx6grdp4Bl6eyW5Q7Xj5xAn+VMkAsb769KNlsKMiU7o=; b=CZEKdxnj1qQkEKFzshzz4l2e/5Y1VrW6UI67LA13P1ZDerc4d9+xPjXRm7YJvfxmTpO0qVx+ uPR5deSQCxM991Pr3n2mUpogKudaPdPbisVsK1zwuChq9dfq4wEjvyb+RE7igIXquI+TPuov 52lQxYGnqsLaWvcJ8Ph2aX2Qm8Y= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 69.72.43.7 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n01.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 6116388566ff1079040dafa9 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:16:53 GMT Sender: wgong=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 547A9C4338A; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:16:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wgong) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D944AC433F1; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:16:51 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 17:16:51 +0800 From: Wen Gong To: Johannes Berg Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mac80211: save transmit power envelope element and power constraint In-Reply-To: References: <20210517201932.8860-1-wgong@codeaurora.org> <20210517201932.8860-10-wgong@codeaurora.org> (sfid-20210517_222034_029448_A9A89D57) <1126f8d996e895ae048092b3f8aad19b@codeaurora.org> <38e7d9d2eebafa7245a36a0a0396094526eb3efd.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1273cc1a399a7457c3d908648a7651c8fe9b93f3.camel@sipsolutions.net> Message-ID: <465b6b8535fc17ae51ee2f3116af87bb@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: wgong@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 2021-08-13 16:53, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 16:47 +0800, Wen Gong wrote: >> > > > > 2) Should we at least check it again from the protected beacon or such >> > > > > after association, so we don't blindly trust the probe response or >> > > > > beacon (received during scan, not validated) at least when BIGTK is in >> > > > > use? >> > > > >> > > > May we add support for BIGTK in future with another patch? >> > > >> > > We already have BIGTK support in mac80211, so if we don't do that now >> > > we're almost certainly not going to do it, so I'd really prefer if you >> > > did it here, or if a separate patch still did it now. >> > >> > Actually, I should say though - the question was more whether we even >> > need/want that, rather than whether we can do it later or not. >> > >> > If we should protect this data/information then IMHO we should do it >> > now, but it's not clear to me that we should, given that we also don't >> > have encrypted association response and we still take information from >> > there too, etc. >> > >> > johannes >> I prefer to add a new enum(not use BSS_CHANGED_TXPOWER),e.g, >> BSS_CHANGED_PWR_ENV. >> And add check in ieee80211_rx_mgmt_beacon() as well as >> ieee80211_handle_pwr_constr(), >> when the value of pwr_reduction or content of elems.tx_pwr_env >> changed, >> save the pwr_reduction and elems.tx_pwr_env to ieee80211_bss_conf, and >> notify lower >> driver with BSS_CHANGED_PWR_ENV, then lower driver will do next >> action. >> > I don't really have any objection to this, but OTOH it feels like > drivers will probably not really listen to this if it can only happen > due to BIGTK? yes, it should have some flag/logic to check whether it is BIGTK. If you know it, you can tell me. :) > > And if we always defer this until the first beacon, that also feels > wrong and bad? It can not defer this untill the 1st beacon which pass BIGTK verify. Lower driver need this info to set power before TX data include EAPOL. > > I'm not sure what the right answer here is, TBH. > > Maybe the right answer is to indeed ignore beacon protection for this, > and do exactly what you did here, and say that the TX power envelope > thing is just not meant to be protected, because the protection is > meant > to protect the connection etc. and not the performance (and > regulatory?) Yes, the lower driver also have the max power limit itself. If power calulated from the fake beacon is bigger than the max power limit, then it will be ignored. > > Do we get this *only* in the beacon, or also in the association > response? If it's also in the association response we could use the > data > from *there*, and basically say that the association response might > need > some protection (later) anyway? > The Transmit Power Envelope is not existed in the assoc response, it is existed in beacon. So it can not use assoc response. beacon: IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN Fixed parameters (12 bytes) Timestamp: 0x0000005070684036 Beacon Interval: 0.102400 [Seconds] Capabilities Information: 0x0511 Tagged parameters (264 bytes) Tag: SSID parameter set: Renhui-6G Tag: Supported Rates and BSS Membership Selectors 6.0(B), 9, 12.0(B), 18, 24(B), 36, 48, 54, [Mbit/sec] Tag: Traffic Indication Map (TIM): DTIM 0 of Tag: Country Information: Country Code US, Environment Unknown (0x04) Tag: Power Constraint: 3 Tag: TPC Report Transmit Power: 17, Link Margin: 0 Tag: Extended Supported Rates and BSS Membership Selectors BSS requires support for direct hashing to elements in SAE, [Mbit/sec] Tag: RSN Information Tag: Extended Capabilities (11 octets) Tag: Transmit Power Envelope Tag: Transmit Power Envelope Ext Tag: Reserved (55) Ext Tag: HE Capabilities (IEEE Std 802.11ax/D2.0) Ext Tag: HE Operation (IEEE Std 802.11ax/D2.0) Ext Tag: Spatial Reuse Parameter Set Ext Tag: MU EDCA Parameter Set Ext Tag: 6GHz Band Capabilities assoc response: IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN Fixed parameters (6 bytes) Capabilities Information: 0x0511 Status code: Successful (0x0000) ..00 0000 0001 0001 = Association ID: 0x0011 Tagged parameters (169 bytes) Tag: Supported Rates and BSS Membership Selectors 6.0(B), 9, 12.0(B), 18, 24(B), 36, 48, 54, [Mbit/sec] Tag: Extended Supported Rates and BSS Membership Selectors BSS requires support for direct hashing to elements in SAE, [Mbit/sec] Tag: Extended Capabilities (11 octets) Ext Tag: HE Capabilities (IEEE Std 802.11ax/D2.0) Ext Tag: HE Operation (IEEE Std 802.11ax/D2.0) Ext Tag: Spatial Reuse Parameter Set Ext Tag: MU EDCA Parameter Set Ext Tag: 6GHz Band Capabilities > johannes