Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:19:43 +0300
From:   Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc:     linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
        Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
        Alvin =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0ipraga?= <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>,
        Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>, svp <svpm@yandex.ru>,
        felix+debian@gueux.org, Massimo Maggi <me@massimo-maggi.eu>
Subject: Re: Revert: ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain
Message-ID: <YSQC32TygIq2SHJR@skv.local>
References: <YSJ//ki/A1EgfLga@skv.local>
 <CA+ASDXNzv6D1PthjUU-CVw6amT+JHmJP2mNSL=LVJKGm0zkEXw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+ASDXNzv6D1PthjUU-CVw6amT+JHmJP2mNSL=LVJKGm0zkEXw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 21-08-23 10:23, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 9:49 AM Andrey Skvortsov
> <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 4) As many users are affected by this problem and maintainers don't really
> > want to revert the problematic patch,
> 
> I'm not totally sure that's true. So far, it looks like an oversight.
> 
> Over a year ago, Kalle said he "just need[ed] to check something
> internally first":
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/87r1rsbdnx.fsf@codeaurora.org/
> 
> I don't see the result of that, except that this is marked Superseded:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200730124923.271429-1-alsi@bang-olufsen.dk/
> and this is marked Rejected:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20200527165718.129307-1-briannorris@chromium.org/
> I'm not sure if the Rejected was before or after the last reply above...
> 
> Maybe it needs an Nth person to submit a revert?

Later (Dec 23, 2020) said "Actually I don't see how I could apply the
revert due to the regulatory problems explained by Jouni". [1]
I think this could be the date when your patch was marked as Rejected.

1. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2020-December/012370.html

-- 
Best regards,
Andrey Skvortsov