Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp806297pxb; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvhOQbD2ZU7pCy9AAqYfPX+kd8yUgub91Q9Izn/9Jr46cG9K1qoCFiu3cDPVNvakmBX2qu X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c416:: with SMTP id u22mr1016305ejz.543.1629932532097; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629932532; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z8b+2T+kqgeEns+xjgLa3LahqNWFN3HXLnNs+HeVnLDJ+hvffAlsdBlUn/gGE/HQD9 M0oFjRT78unkjcFJIUZagTH6c8yCdDS6RaZ5owmWLcTo686TJ9IMrs6xfJywlmmUpPmG TImwpDGbyZxP16JLuEbCWZZ8JFLk6wGNNYf4Pze03E/sIE6IbIwyxtfc3LoSj5wv+RtB TNBKIW9CiEe9rAE2TLuvmJ23fkIH+q4sK5UY9qAqcHT+CyT4m0zNChYkOaMgM8JtSCoo OmqkZ60OhmeR5EckkNRAaeCqD8cNChEj6yQ217y71h6iEZ8YGHgikOTZDOibpRYsH38s 6SIQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=c7HZlWC8KJohv3wxpeiYZ8xLIfggzme+ADhSLyEO+Yg=; b=SQcAjS4NEd3mumjrVfAUGC0zqlDRKNBG1c4akRRtP6RguhPL5V6GaiCKILctAAfqeE encIbul2mHHiArJx105arFtzj8usbr5zKae0dGXK73pnMsx64MPBKnwBs9YjxZ8PMSsC p3pYIEb5KWqgytjZ2w2oYRV9w/C756SBFzrnjCJuhXLFuYD8ysWoVoGtVJnMHZhEVq+P O6emZRySeXCFrkOizEusKuanDJZt/k63GKR0xaabIi1LmVh60Id5LYTGoMVntsNOg9Rq 1uBqSKxsAutaSX1B65aJDIMvmpL2DfgPAuo6RN8tHfuf89XlYx75fRmCRRrBJJ4cbrrZ i+rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kzEpcmV5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g16si1140986edv.404.2021.08.25.16.01.46; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kzEpcmV5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232726AbhHYXC1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:02:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46434 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231535AbhHYXC1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:02:27 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366E5C061757 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id t35so1630087oiw.9 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:01:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c7HZlWC8KJohv3wxpeiYZ8xLIfggzme+ADhSLyEO+Yg=; b=kzEpcmV5cjVZjLrrDSrvWkwENdpxVZywXviL2w13mDb8LhPUcHx18eBMtuuR/U7BqI ZBKvsv64+VAjwxU4viRTT4nf5zu4onbxB+qAxSJpNMlD1DJGNen7l30Cp1ht2ou31L9H VKHIM2jFvbsin05OfbFvHhuCQOxJ7R44MPwzLP1C6tQaQwwxGAlnCE7hi4FGjLz8u16+ OC6z0MJYoQwJMM962U3yNW4tfxBcXfqbOgrBOn/dv8pSDftHpuji1V6yPx38fG5JbX89 XmiOpYmlNVouCymyfVL4YxXrnc64+dqvTc5elJ/n5Hm7zJJjk9L4nkvyosV+9WmN9zRc I51A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c7HZlWC8KJohv3wxpeiYZ8xLIfggzme+ADhSLyEO+Yg=; b=GaKXP7bFrOGnHxnGDJRAUL8YwXrZCBVA/LYoZRVebBBUUQ6/VGmk55K6CHBn/vRzb+ CsCreIt7A5hR9FrD58XSUV7P6k7Tb5dguAqwkuMFZ+Y0BhaJloRTN3H0KakGNPmcZQ8S aoLc0apLZr+s0m5lHNmT1f39GY9xEak48s5EFzOUeCDhaLJzDHeO0ADQpH+RzkES05uN M6jVpXEkvZtccVp+qiZIu2mZxD8VVw+b2XIFdVc0Vq8S4gXzzlRoDNrC1bNzvsTxQETx joaqouEf3f8+VDetcWBLAPBAsCxNoWDnJfVvA3NRoXYCSaPZtnWEpkxhRTIMJ3RC1yma T10g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531d+wIKD10iYzSFkgr/2NaKt7mgEWZ8c1TreeKxBAsR8dSkgbNL cfZrTPha0G94zfCOBeuFBUJNIt2X5OQmV9yqujw= X-Received: by 2002:aca:3488:: with SMTP id b130mr8461960oia.17.1629932500628; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:01:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1629884277-18759-1-git-send-email-ppranees@codeaurora.org> <1629884277-18759-12-git-send-email-ppranees@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <1629884277-18759-12-git-send-email-ppranees@codeaurora.org> From: Sergey Ryazanov Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:02:10 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] ath11k: add branch predictors in dp_tx path To: P Praneesh Cc: Kalle Valo , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Sriram R , Jouni Malinen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:39 PM P Praneesh wrote: > Add branch prediction in dp_tx code path in > tx and tx completion handlers. > > Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-01734-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 v2 > > Co-developed-by: Sriram R > Signed-off-by: Sriram R > Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen > Signed-off-by: P Praneesh > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++---------------- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mac.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c > index 8bba523..ab9ccf0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/dp_tx.c [skipped] > @@ -432,12 +432,12 @@ static void ath11k_dp_tx_complete_msdu(struct ath11k *ar, > > rcu_read_lock(); > > - if (!rcu_dereference(ab->pdevs_active[ar->pdev_idx])) { > + if (unlikely(!rcu_dereference(ab->pdevs_active[ar->pdev_idx]))) { > dev_kfree_skb_any(msdu); > goto exit; > } This is another place where rcu_dereference() could be replaced by the rcu_access_pointer() and the whole block could be moved above the rcu_read_lock(). On the other hand this is an _unlikely_ path, so it looks like a matter of taste which macro to use here. -- Sergey