Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wcn36xx: handle connection loss indication
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210901180606.11686-1-benl@squareup.com>
 <8735qn2ats.fsf@codeaurora.org>
From:   Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com>
Message-ID: <3a587de2-f605-fd17-4d70-878b13354b39@squareup.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 11:37:12 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8735qn2ats.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 9/2/21 9:37 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com> writes:
> 
>> Firmware sends delete_sta_context_ind when it detects the AP has gone
>> away in STA mode. Right now the handler for that indication only handles
>> AP mode; fix it to also handle STA mode.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Li <benl@squareup.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> 
> How well is this tested? I'm pondering should I queue this to v5.15 or
> v5.16, at the moment I'm leaning towards v5.16.
>
It was an issue reported during internal testing, and the patch has not
yet had soak time with our quality team/field devices. v5.16 sounds fine.

Ben