Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp366490pxb; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:47:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhWH9ShLs25LYRbn15Ar8Cn6ibtrE4waRwxRA4E7fwz2iScatS+qq5cirireyE+jdWxPe9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b111:: with SMTP id z17mr12170543pjq.142.1635180449946; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1635180449; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q9jaB/1mxqTxRkbX5mrinCWJ3GUIWSp73zNX4cH2tSMvEazG67170lHxjovdjthQ18 QQfKLymXUzcezohpiCZS30Na0YAEZB8wLYE562UVY0+r4YP5FSMFyMBMWcJtRH4EuJj/ c4YlAOSdYjjr51/8m8r1nhO6Q9g4ULv8fnRAi5t00U+Y6aThdBPu/SywE7jJrWOjfzqM yUtPQXJLjFbpJaZJuNSpso7r41nYxMfE9x46UiHRCmfQQcRbVxWiIwAF+dRO1YgmlFef oc5WI+6ibxw9XL2tAP8yCOI6jQBB0dXTYX1zATbkDftGQcT0EhK5AvkZ9NgvoqBS8bC5 0+Mw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:mime-version:date :message-id; bh=ztRk2vRgIS4GRtN91I8DbQ0NvdNuwijJKZJWyvN4O8E=; b=gyWoPNr7ouX+d+pe7GMUCmcVn5pcwe9tvQVXiGprXqbH0g+9w58uj/wuc4kX7OVoOe M29sax3Rd1RcR0ILi9o13b+tcxOyfpIJLMBnafWMyeq8ONmv2sqiT3xVvY4K4gXCSMz1 vdfL3rIlEMOKtyaA+TUKBCYA4uTXNnY5BBmZYEMM5ZSF/e7B4z5JoMRuuewI3ZxTjjBl 7GMXMTeXgG2M7dCScijxRO5J0rqCFGwa34k5hT4nBibdAwSvW+zh+nXVB/nVH06A16c4 YsKDpdxJ683UDw4rcIDdAJraP0WwRwPrEqj9awf076ef8mPE9vgBqCt//5j/+YVRf3HH xyLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 129si22413895pfy.191.2021.10.25.09.47.08; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234091AbhJYQsD (ORCPT + 66 others); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:48:03 -0400 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.172]:59386 "EHLO mout-p-202.mailbox.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231127AbhJYQsD (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:48:03 -0400 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HdLRk2wvLzQk12; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:45:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Message-ID: <2157749e-4e88-76c1-bdc9-f01656f5a292@v0yd.nl> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:45:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: Add quirk resetting the PCI bridge on MS Surface devices Content-Language: en-US To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=c3=a1r?= , Amitkumar Karwar , Ganapathi Bhat , Xinming Hu , Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Tsuchiya Yuto , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Maximilian Luz , Andy Shevchenko , Bjorn Helgaas , Heiner Kallweit , Johannes Berg , Brian Norris , David Laight , Vidya Sagar , Victor Ding References: <20211018153529.GA2235731@bhelgaas> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jonas_Dre=c3=9fler?= In-Reply-To: <20211018153529.GA2235731@bhelgaas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 62ADB4A3 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On 10/18/21 17:35, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:08:31AM +0200, Jonas Dreßler wrote: >> On 10/12/21 17:39, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> [+cc Vidya, Victor, ASPM L1.2 config issue; beginning of thread: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211011134238.16551-1-verdre@v0yd.nl/] > >>> I wonder if this reset quirk works because pci_reset_function() saves >>> and restores much of config space, but it currently does *not* restore >>> the L1 PM Substates capability, so those T_POWER_ON, >>> Common_Mode_Restore_Time, and LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD values probably get >>> cleared out by the reset. We did briefly save/restore it [1], but we >>> had to revert that because of a regression that AFAIK was never >>> resolved [2]. I expect we will eventually save/restore this, so if >>> the quirk depends on it *not* being restored, that would be a problem. >>> >>> You should be able to test whether this is the critical thing by >>> clearing those registers with setpci instead of doing the reset. Per >>> spec, they can only be modified when L1.2 is disabled, so you would >>> have to disable it via sysfs (for the endpoint, I think) >>> /sys/.../l1_2_aspm and /sys/.../l1_2_pcipm, do the setpci on the root >>> port, then re-enable L1.2. >>> >>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/4257f7e008ea >>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210127160449.2990506-1-helgaas@kernel.org/ >> >> Hmm, interesting, thanks for those links. >> >> Are you sure the config values will get lost on the reset? If we only reset >> the port by going into D3hot and back into D0, the device will remain powered >> and won't lose the config space, will it? > > I think you're doing a PM reset (transition to D3hot and back to D0). > Linux only does this when PCI_PM_CTRL_NO_SOFT_RESET == 0. The spec > doesn't actually *require* the device to be reset; it only says the > internal state of the device is undefined after these transitions. > Not requiring the device to be reset sounds sensible to me given that D3hot is what devices are transitioned into during suspend. But anyway, that doesn't really get us any further except it somewhat gives an explanation why the LTR is suddenly 0 after the reset. Or are you making the point that we shouldn't rely on "undefined state" for this hack because not all PCI bridges/ports will necessarily behave the same?