Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp6275238pxb; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 06:07:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVuRSGhUzVGL5iRxrMv8Nej8TaFoHRbyYtWYPDc0RJV+wZybJbYULb35ctrXVsUXRDT+vI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:13ca:: with SMTP id v10mr139915ilj.140.1636380449426; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:07:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1636380449; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Yvo1RWk9k7QGmJ2EhvjSKly1nNsEd4pBdDWz9Z9YUKaxZ3Fr0tuzrhbOKjQ+IpoqzX bZZK790WLR69TiL2sACx+QK3oiBAOJgYsU2/mwhLVf/thXGpv7aD/J9i3Ql3gwQ+Euih Kmm224IORUPZ9hnwa+BDpvpqh6mH2uDKRgrZoGpNtB5hjACW04wQ6C5pn9FVSUu/Tvoa qnupq+0mvlT3J2u+yFx/3JI0jvgGtxenT3ab9Bpcj5qkKHfcff6zdVCluR77E0lEpKMg PTH5Ray6n1fCITSGnt81ley05X34cdCn4Ra3q5S8O7KV61LuABey6PXTKzQoWikewStS mPSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=+OY7Lfj2ZI2Xx88VmfyxrkMxGqeVvLBxYcumCINC030=; b=riWMlD8EeDhA4Ax1m7rvWjH68c/eME22ggbxvqKOlefNdxyii2W2itbgfCc0PFD/a0 5EfuAsE8iCF62TCSzzmwgCa47EwSeOruIeY8pzFrUQNWI82iN1a3zIohADMUyurItGJF VLtufLiZNoxdnYmFGoJX5mtW0yFbpEHuTKG8vyJqY2Pd2cAOhsQBcUCNFyA370K1iKgp 06fAAVsF+a7yYlE8e3tnFGVztxRflD4hd8H+7DQecFXT6d6U1ugIvOXH/eyoEh0ZyWK1 NkYnr5mtFdSGJQIi1/tzJ16o/8TTeZkRJWmfJFqRVOQKyqwhbfGpAVLp2N5pNQ+j6pUF 5C5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mediatek.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t34si32512642jal.104.2021.11.08.06.07.15; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mediatek.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236890AbhKHK5b (ORCPT + 68 others); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 05:57:31 -0500 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]:9553 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236768AbhKHK5a (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 05:57:30 -0500 X-UUID: 2c863e0f195343c2b0b5233da5948600-20211108 X-UUID: 2c863e0f195343c2b0b5233da5948600-20211108 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 634995696; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 03:54:44 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.183) by MTKMBS62N1.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 02:50:51 -0800 Received: from mtksdccf07 (172.21.84.99) by mtkmbs10n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.2.792.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:50:51 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt76: mt7921: introduce 160 MHz channel bandwidth support From: Deren Wu To: Lorenzo Bianconi CC: Felix Fietkau , Sean Wang , "Soul Huang" , YN Chen , Leon Yen , Eric-SY Chang , KM Lin , Robin Chiu , CH Yeh , Posh Sun , Eric Liang , Stella Chang , "Evelyn Tsai" , Ryder Lee , "Shayne Chen" , linux-wireless , linux-mediatek Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 18:50:51 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <8780cd7315953270b14d491dd426032a697fba0b.camel@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MTK: N Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 11:10 +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > Hi Lore, > > > > The definition of cap->max_bw is identical to > > ieee80211_sta_rx_bandwidth. For now, the value would be > > IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160 if the chip supports bw160. > > ok, so why not something like: > > dev->phy.cap.has_bw160 = cap->max_bw == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160; > > Regards, > Lorenzo Hi Lore, Sure, we should do the assignment preciesly. I will update next version. Regards, Deren > > > > > > > Regards, > > Deren > > > > On Sun, 2021-11-07 at 11:45 +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > > From: Deren Wu > > > > > > > > Introduce the basic configuration for chips with BW160 > > > > capability > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Deren Wu > > > > --- > > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 1 + > > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c | 1 + > > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c | 4 ++++ > > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c | 12 > > > > ++++++++++++ > > > > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h > > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h > > > > index e2da720a91b6..babca8086027 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h > > > > @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ struct mt76_hw_cap { > > > > bool has_2ghz; > > > > bool has_5ghz; > > > > bool has_6ghz; > > > > + bool has_bw160; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > #define MT_DRV_TXWI_NO_FREE BIT(0) > > > > diff --git > > > > a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > > index 26b4b875dcc0..4da20537aaf9 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > > @@ -1775,6 +1775,7 @@ static void > > > > mt76_connac_mcu_parse_phy_cap(struct mt76_dev *dev, > > > > dev->phy.chainmask = dev->phy.antenna_mask; > > > > dev->phy.cap.has_2ghz = cap->hw_path & BIT(WF0_24G); > > > > dev->phy.cap.has_5ghz = cap->hw_path & BIT(WF0_5G); > > > > + dev->phy.cap.has_bw160 = (cap->max_bw >= > > > > IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160); > > > > > > Hi Deren, > > > > > > just out of my curiosity, what are the possible values of cap- > > > >max_bw > > > here? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Lorenzo > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > int mt76_connac_mcu_get_nic_capability(struct mt76_phy *phy) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c > > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c > > > > index 210998f086ab..30c0246fba3a 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c > > > > @@ -264,6 +264,10 @@ int mt7921_register_device(struct > > > > mt7921_dev > > > > *dev) > > > > IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SU_BEAMFORMEE_CAPABLE > > > > | > > > > IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_MU_BEAMFORMEE_CAPABLE > > > > | > > > > (3 << > > > > IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_BEAMFORMEE_STS_SHIFT); > > > > + if (dev->mt76.phy.cap.has_bw160) > > > > + dev->mphy.sband_5g.sband.vht_cap.cap |= > > > > + IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MH > > > > Z | > > > > + IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SHORT_GI_160; > > > > > > > > dev->mphy.hw->wiphy->available_antennas_rx = dev- > > > > > mphy.chainmask; > > > > > > > > dev->mphy.hw->wiphy->available_antennas_tx = dev- > > > > > mphy.chainmask; > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c > > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c > > > > index 633c6d2a57ac..af8c675f909f 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c > > > > @@ -128,11 +128,23 @@ mt7921_init_he_caps(struct mt7921_phy > > > > *phy, > > > > enum nl80211_band band, > > > > IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP9_RX_1024_Q > > > > AM_LESS_ > > > > THAN_242_TONE_RU | > > > > IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP9_RX_FULL_B > > > > W_SU_USI > > > > NG_MU_WITH_COMP_SIGB | > > > > IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP9_RX_FULL_B > > > > W_SU_USI > > > > NG_MU_WITH_NON_COMP_SIGB; > > > > + > > > > + if (phy->mt76->cap.has_bw160) { > > > > + he_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |= > > > > + IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP0_C > > > > HANNEL_W > > > > IDTH_SET_160MHZ_IN_5G; > > > > + he_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[8] |= > > > > + IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP8_2 > > > > 0MHZ_IN_ > > > > 160MHZ_HE_PPDU | > > > > + IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP8_8 > > > > 0MHZ_IN_ > > > > 160MHZ_HE_PPDU; > > > > + } > > > > break; > > > > } > > > > > > > > he_mcs->rx_mcs_80 = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); > > > > he_mcs->tx_mcs_80 = cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); > > > > + if (phy->mt76->cap.has_bw160) { > > > > + he_mcs->rx_mcs_160 = > > > > cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); > > > > + he_mcs->tx_mcs_160 = > > > > cpu_to_le16(mcs_map); > > > > + } > > > > > > > > memset(he_cap->ppe_thres, 0, sizeof(he_cap- > > > > > ppe_thres)); > > > > > > > > if (he_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[6] & > > > > -- > > > > 2.18.0 > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-mediatek mailing list > > > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek