Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E59C433F5 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346416AbhLBBqs (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 20:46:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32858 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344264AbhLBBqr (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 20:46:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58977C061574 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 17:43:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d24so56333825wra.0 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:43:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OUHJxgm31kZ5HlHTPWQ2dagOtbXRFGWbUyccHHiAAUk=; b=jRJN+INEefaPfDOYf6payOCZs3DGCSuk1WZw502uVs05KIbtFXlBPQSh10QdCGPpUK FDcUEcP2EaK3ylJfUqckZAhqlgiEnPYWueF26jZG5yn3EYCHx9stoTrAXbzn7lvg53cP 0JiL+JKaXR8WeBdvFeHgyxmf1apdHm1kf9CQC+Omh5c1G76Z07CBjocaYRXbopZue37a A9FiZuyTHyee1qSNUqNzepoYMqtYYB4/YLi+3S9V0F4Bk+0OfYeHtvnUm6VS1o929rcD /CAdlbnw/lKm+gvO16S3K/3/dTh2K8x3VD1IbrGjHD3ruG9IaV5OlCWviJ6O7gnXxmZa w6CA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OUHJxgm31kZ5HlHTPWQ2dagOtbXRFGWbUyccHHiAAUk=; b=tLFUX4Uh9T+vrSsu2roBn9Om2KQKtW3CC4rKI3EhOXf5LDAXn0nI+FsVUaPGy3kCC6 z55MHNlkz6r/wP9WYM0izOFIhdQeK1S0GbESYV53qUnQ4JajuOYeOTy9ivrZxCR5x9I4 1NWXWkDART9/2p7QFGPV7SXyD6D62DxqNmeBvHkJytb/rbalUSK2YH/OcgWmElHyxOqg M9qrrjtdbm+HHY1YWjJXJU9Bx98eLXBespt/4ex4TW6XeelXtv/hhRnTXeamSmCRK6YE sR2HlXzoE4uMcjGd8LHNX8L919L0q8nswbwNoUK465CREv6xOdOBaYDbRaA17iXIdF0E Qq7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qRGILa/xIZJn21NwxrweKXAsD2NcbwMSZFVlFeHJAq7NZUhj5 aXjhpg4uemcvrKECCIxkmhulGK8938VferxOxc4E4XKPXMBbYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJJf8PPy8acKX8Qp17K7hiepUPb5rbheUah3CdxJyqHcrPEJ6kRHWrZLeQx8iFpTbLQE83lNbD6yAO1IC0Ol4= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6508:: with SMTP id x8mr10593847wru.388.1638409403614; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:43:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <74887ec8f49846f5ae8b40b4c213d2da@realtek.com> <5dc56416-7564-6a11-d477-9841b27a7123@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <5dc56416-7564-6a11-d477-9841b27a7123@lwfinger.net> From: Jeff Clay Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:42:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Latency spikes in rtw89 To: Larry Finger Cc: Pkshih , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Setting "options rtw89core disable_ps_mode=Y" in /etc/modprobe.d/rtw89.conf didn't help. On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:39 AM Larry Finger wrote: > > On 12/1/21 08:48, Jeff Clay wrote: > > Thank you for the information. Would the issue persist if I were to > > disable wireless power management? > > That is an easy experiment to try. Use the "disable_ps_mode=y' module option for > rtw89core. > > Larry >