Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF675C433EF for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 08:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239685AbhLFIvq (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 03:51:46 -0500 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:48529 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239624AbhLFIvp (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Dec 2021 03:51:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1638780496; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=RgEGARtdX8Ecq3hZIc6J30SsDuIyhFkmJZWmTKtHbWs=; b=kLuedqTNgIgeB6+CBxSyCI2WQZHSECD/CSbpruOPC/ZRTqozhsYiP8o27vv3swDpg6Yp+SZ3 2DWcZC5cgkH4AxOnBlcASYe90GgmTKP9pqAHJ5SoqxLOOfVN8yYiS+ugSUkLCY3WoVuXray8 xtbTp/HZCsrFYUQmHJCtxih8EAk= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI3YTAwOSIsICJsaW51eC13aXJlbGVzc0B2Z2VyLmtlcm5lbC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n09.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 61adce507d878c8dedfa1c9f (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Mon, 06 Dec 2021 08:48:16 GMT Sender: wgong=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 96E95C4360D; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 08:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wgong) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEA78C4360C; Mon, 6 Dec 2021 08:48:04 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 16:48:04 +0800 From: Wen Gong To: Johannes Berg Cc: Venkateswara Naralasetty , Venkateswara Naralasetty , ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wgong=codeaurora.org@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] cfg80211: save power spectral density(psd) of regulatory rule In-Reply-To: <6053b0963612057267f00b89e14b9e15@codeaurora.org> References: <20210928085211.26186-1-wgong@codeaurora.org> <2afb1bf6f06cb53f43fe0d354afa4e7c@codeaurora.org> <2ed76cff292dcca18326de0407a93821@codeaurora.org> <1222384c2bc7d80bf572b65ab17660477bb27300.camel@sipsolutions.net> <562080d7fc3b7568811c47a8e8e79156@codeaurora.org> <0b05f6e555bcb89c49f56279c077ce63@codeaurora.org> <18363bc18538ea9b7e8fe28f4c5595c54f3b93d3.camel@sipsolutions.net> <67936afa5545b9a5d6eb5ad6931026d7@codeaurora.org> <6053b0963612057267f00b89e14b9e15@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <68b700b371399db0ed4174d20ddd0b8b@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: wgong@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi Johannes, Are you waiting for the AP/STA concurrency patches, then apply this patch? On 2021-11-09 17:57, Wen Gong wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > do you have comments about my description for PSD? > > On 2021-10-26 19:26, Wen Gong wrote: >> On 2021-10-26 04:09, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 15:48 +0800, Wen Gong wrote: >>>> >>>> > IMO, Only power rules and PSD info might vary for AP and STATION. Rest >>>> > of the rules will remains same right? >>>> > >>>> The freq_range may also be different for AP and STATION. >>>> and reg_rules number also may also be different for AP and STATION. >>>> >>>> for example: >>>> SUBORDINATE CLIENT of STANDARD POWER reg rules number 2 >>>> reg rule 1: (5945 - 6425 @ 160) (0, 30) (FLAGS 0) (psd flag 1 EIRP >>>> 17 >>>> dB/MHz) >>>> reg rule 2: (6525 - 6885 @ 160) (0, 30) (FLAGS 0) (psd flag 1 EIRP >>>> 17 >>>> dB/MHz) >>>> >>>> INDOOR AP reg rules number 1 >>>> reg rule 1: (5945 - 7125 @ 160) (0, 24) (FLAGS 0) (psd flag 0 EIRP 0 >>>> dB/MHz) >>> >>> That seems right, but isn't that an orthogonal question? >>> >>> Here, on this patch, we're discussing what data we should have in the >>> channel information, and it would seem that if it's different for >>> AP/client, then we do need both information stored, so that we can >>> cope >>> with concurrency between AP and client? >>> >>> If we additionally need to have different data for the regulatory >>> rules >>> for AP and client, that might mean we need to go back and actually >>> change the code there *as well*, and then fill in the right fields in >>> this patch? >>> >>> Unless somehow we're convinced that for this feature we don't need to >>> worry about concurrently using AP and client modes? >>> >>> johannes >> >> Currently these patches of mac80211/cfg80211/ieee80211 for LPI/SP/VLP >> is >> the base patches, to enable the feature of LPI/SP/VLP, it still need >> other >> patches of lower drivers such as ath11k to enable it. It will not have >> LPI/SP/VLP without patches of ath11k, it means all these patches will >> not take effect. >> >> When lower driver such as ath11k set max_interfaces of >> ieee80211_iface_combination >> to 1, then it can not start more than 1 interface on the same >> ieee80211_hw/wiphy. >> When STATION interface is up, then AP interface can not start up. AP >> interface >> can start up after STATION interfacedown. Also when AP interface is >> up, >> STATION interface can not start up. STATION interface can start up >> after >> AP interface down. >> >> I have sent out my ath11k >> patches(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20211026111913.7346-1-quic_wgong@quicinc.com/), >> it will allow only one interface >> up simultaneously for the chip which enable LPI/SP/VLP feature in this >> patch: "ath11k: allow only one interface up simultaneously for >> WCN6855" >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20211026111913.7346-5-quic_wgong@quicinc.com/ >> It means it will not have both AP/STA together and these patches of >> mac80211/ >> cfg80211/ieee80211 not need changes and it will not have bugs. >> >> If there are some chip want to both enable LPI/SP/VLP feature and >> enable AP/STA simultaneously in same ieee80211_hw/wiphy in future, >> then he/she need to refine reg rules and channels of >> mac80211/cfg80211/ >> ieee80211, but at that moment, this patch "cfg80211: save power >> spectral density(psd) of regulatory rule" still not need change. >> Because this patch is change in each reg rule/each channel in a >> low layer, the refine reg rules and channels is a high layer, they >> have no intersection.