Message-ID: <e5f9385f-0dfe-60cb-eca3-16aa7dbe3121@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:41:03 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] net: wwan: t7xx: Add AT and MBIM WWAN ports
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
        M Chetan Kumar <m.chetan.kumar@intel.com>,
        chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com,
        Intel Corporation <linuxwwan@intel.com>,
        chiranjeevi.rapolu@linux.intel.com, haijun.liu@mediatek.com,
        amir.hanania@intel.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        dinesh.sharma@intel.com, eliot.lee@intel.com,
        mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, moises.veleta@intel.com,
        pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com, muralidharan.sethuraman@intel.com,
        Soumya.Prakash.Mishra@intel.com, sreehari.kancharla@intel.com,
        suresh.nagaraj@intel.com
References: <20211101035635.26999-1-ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
 <20211101035635.26999-7-ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
 <CAHNKnsRe-88_jXvW4=0rPSDhVTbnJnDoeLpjHS4ouDv3pJXWSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <a9f1237c-78d5-d64e-6980-a7c7c5f6f5f9@linux.intel.com>
 <CAHNKnsSn9TRHdZiih6Y0geSD+e5CdY-uUeuvAvWdA0==e8GEEw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Martinez, Ricardo" <ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHNKnsSn9TRHdZiih6Y0geSD+e5CdY-uUeuvAvWdA0==e8GEEw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 12/1/2021 12:45 PM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martinez, Ricardo
> <ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 11/9/2021 4:06 AM, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:57 AM Ricardo Martinez wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>    static struct t7xx_port md_ccci_ports[] = {
>>>> +       {CCCI_UART2_TX, CCCI_UART2_RX, DATA_AT_CMD_Q, DATA_AT_CMD_Q, 0xff,
>>>> +        0xff, ID_CLDMA1, PORT_F_RX_CHAR_NODE, &wwan_sub_port_ops, 0, "ttyC0", WWAN_PORT_AT},
>>>> +       {CCCI_MBIM_TX, CCCI_MBIM_RX, 2, 2, 0, 0, ID_CLDMA1,
>>>> +        PORT_F_RX_CHAR_NODE, &wwan_sub_port_ops, 10, "ttyCMBIM0", WWAN_PORT_MBIM},
>>>> ...
>>>> +               if (count + CCCI_H_ELEN > txq_mtu &&
>>>> +                   (port_ccci->tx_ch == CCCI_MBIM_TX ||
>>>> +                    (port_ccci->tx_ch >= CCCI_DSS0_TX && port_ccci->tx_ch <= CCCI_DSS7_TX)))
>>>> +                       multi_packet = DIV_ROUND_UP(count, txq_mtu - CCCI_H_ELEN);
>>> I am just wondering, the chip does support MBIM message fragmentation,
>>> but does not support AT commands stream (CCCI_UART2_TX) fragmentation.
>>> Is that the correct conclusion from the code above?
>> Yes, that is correct.
> Are you sure that the modem does not support AT command fragmentation?
> The AT commands interface is a stream of chars by its nature. It is
> designed to work over serial lines. Some modem configuration software
> even writes commands to a port in a char-by-char manner, i.e. it
> writes no more than one char at a time to the port.
>
> The mechanism that is implemented in the driver to split user input
> into individual messages is not a true fragmentation mechanism since
> it does not preserve the original user input length. It just cuts the
> user input into individual messages and sends them to the modem
> independently. So, the modem firmware has no way to distinguish
> whether the user input has been "fragmented" by the user or the
> driver. How, then, does the modem firmware deal with an AT command
> "fragmented" by a user? Will the modem firmware ignore the AT command
> that is received in the char-by-char manner?

The modem supports char-by-char AT command over serial lines, I'll get 
more information

about why splitting long commands is supported only for MBIM and not for 
AT commands.