Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1305BC433FE for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235635AbhL1IVh (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 03:21:37 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]:36784 "EHLO dfw.source.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235547AbhL1IVd (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 03:21:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 147D76118E; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB991C36AE8; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:21:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1640679691; bh=AyTvVvui2qlcHtQrKzueO2aVJtq3B/0n6NTMMAVaPv0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kH6mvQE+CbYxtdqKfYIrcnXRRkMOKzNgkkDI4Qj231PIqAVKah1gnHZGbf7pyzYif 5Fy29Whi1PzPFIz42NBP1CwIg6Czpkv7Hvsk4tV4vJc5VHnlaMIkb+39JrPmPYspb6 8Fb7cSFih5JdAhKULSvypMAJ71q6QDfYXW2GEFIA= Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 09:21:23 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Niklas Schnelle Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Helgaas , John Garry , Nick Hu , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Guo Ren , Damien Le Moal , Ian Abbott , H Hartley Sweeten , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Dmitry Torokhov , Karsten Keil , Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sathya Prakash , Sreekanth Reddy , Suganath Prabu Subramani , Michael Grzeschik , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , Kalle Valo , Jouni Malinen , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Hannes Reinecke , Kashyap Desai , Sumit Saxena , Shivasharan S , Nilesh Javali , GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com, Mark Brown , Sudip Mukherjee , Teddy Wang , Forest Bond , Jiri Slaby , Wim Van Sebroeck , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [RFC 01/32] Kconfig: introduce and depend on LEGACY_PCI Message-ID: References: <20211227164317.4146918-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> <20211227164317.4146918-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211227164317.4146918-2-schnelle@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:42:46PM +0100, Niklas Schnelle wrote: > --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig > @@ -23,6 +23,17 @@ menuconfig PCI > > if PCI > > +config LEGACY_PCI > + bool "Enable support for legacy PCI devices" > + depends on HAVE_PCI > + help > + This option enables support for legacy PCI devices. This includes > + PCI devices attached directly or via a bridge on a PCI Express bus. > + It also includes compatibility features on PCI Express devices which > + make use of legacy I/O spaces. All you really care about is the "legacy" I/O spaces here, this isn't tied to PCI specifically at all, right? So why not just have a OLD_STYLE_IO config option or something like that, to show that it's the i/o functions we care about here, not PCI at all? And maybe not call it "old" or "legacy" as time constantly goes forward, just describe it as it is, "DIRECT_IO"? thanks, greg k-h