Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To:     =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
        Pali =?utf-8?Q?Roh?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A1r?= <pali@kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/24] wfx: add main.c/main.h
In-Reply-To: <2534738.AP0T11PbZZ@pc-42> (=?utf-8?B?IkrDqXLDtG1l?=
 Pouiller"'s message of "Thu,
        10 Feb 2022 17:37:51 +0100")
References: <20220111171424.862764-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
        <39159625.OdyKsPGY69@pc-42> <87a6ey3d0e.fsf@kernel.org>
        <2534738.AP0T11PbZZ@pc-42>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:08:01 +0200
Message-ID: <874k553mpa.fsf@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> writes:

>> > There is also the patch 01/24 about the SDIO IDs.
>> >
>> > I think the v10 could contain only 3 patches:
>> >
>> >     1. mmc: sdio: add SDIO IDs for Silabs WF200 chip
>> >     2. dt-bindings: introduce silabs,wfx.yaml
>> >     3. [all the patches 3 to 24 squashed]
>> >
>> > Would it be right for you?
>>=20
>> TBH I don't see the point of patch 3 at this moment, we have had so many
>> iterations with the full driver already. If people want to look at the
>> driver, they can check it from the staging tree. So in the next round I
>> recommend submitting only patches 1 and 2 and focus on getting all the
>> pending patches to staging tree.
>
> Ok.
>
>> And the chances are that a big patch like that would be filtered by the
>> mailing lists anyway.
>
> I believe that with -M, the patch would be very small.

Ah, you mean patch 3 would be about moving wfx from drivers/staging to
drivers/net/wireless? Yeah, with -M that would be a good idea.

--=20
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatc=
hes