Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To:     "Aloka Dixit \(QUIC\)" <quic_alokad@quicinc.com>
Cc:     'Johannes Berg' <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Vikram Kandukuri \(QUIC\)" <quic_vikram@quicinc.com>,
        "Jia Ding \(QUIC\)" <quic_jiad@quicinc.com>,
        "Karthikeyan Periyasamy \(QUIC\)" <quic_periyasa@quicinc.com>,
        "Muna Sinada \(QUIC\)" <quic_msinada@quicinc.com>,
        "Sriram R \(QUIC\)" <quic_srirrama@quicinc.com>,
        "ilan.peer\@intel.com" <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/19] cfg80211: Add data structures to capture EHT capabilities
References: <20220210192008.188166-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
        <20220210201853.c40044dc90e9.I2413a37c8f7d2d6d638038a3d95360a3fce0114d@changeid>
        <DM8PR02MB7958C66988E52F40F0ED8A6AFE309@DM8PR02MB7958.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
        <13d897bae6ac5bfd25c7b2e2c80fdaac392334ce.camel@sipsolutions.net>
        <DM8PR02MB7958BEAFECDCC17097F4A731FE339@DM8PR02MB7958.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:28:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR02MB7958BEAFECDCC17097F4A731FE339@DM8PR02MB7958.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
        (Aloka Dixit's message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:55:52 +0000")
Message-ID: <87wnhwa8ro.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

"Aloka Dixit (QUIC)" <quic_alokad@quicinc.com> writes:

> (something weird happened with your quoting?)
> Yeah =E2=98=B9 need to check.
>
> AP mode, especially non-mac80211, wasn't really high on our list ...
>
> I'm also not sure it really belongs to this patch, since this patch was
> just meant to capture the EHT capabilities of the device, not support AP
> mode :-)
>
> I think I'd prefer to have a separate patch, later, and we can discuss
> whether I should submit that or you want to (I cannot really test it).
> Any objections?
>
> Sure, that sounds good!
> Thanks.

Aloka, your quotes are still wrong. It's impossible to see which is
Johannes' text and which is yours.

--=20
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatc=
hes