Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 15:26:36 +0200 (EET)
From:   =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
cc:     Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
        ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
        m.chetan.kumar@intel.com, chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com,
        linuxwwan@intel.com, chiranjeevi.rapolu@linux.intel.com,
        haijun.liu@mediatek.com, amir.hanania@intel.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        dinesh.sharma@intel.com, eliot.lee@intel.com,
        moises.veleta@intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com,
        muralidharan.sethuraman@intel.com, Soumya.Prakash.Mishra@intel.com,
        sreehari.kancharla@intel.com, madhusmita.sahu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 10/13] net: wwan: t7xx: Introduce power
 management
In-Reply-To: <20220223223326.28021-11-ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <3fe7f932-57b7-14c7-4966-7484df7f8250@linux.intel.com>
References: <20220223223326.28021-1-ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com> <20220223223326.28021-11-ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 23 Feb 2022, Ricardo Martinez wrote:

> From: Haijun Liu <haijun.liu@mediatek.com>
> 
> Implements suspend, resumes, freeze, thaw, poweroff, and restore
> `dev_pm_ops` callbacks.
> 
> >From the host point of view, the t7xx driver is one entity. But, the
> device has several modules that need to be addressed in different ways
> during power management (PM) flows.
> The driver uses the term 'PM entities' to refer to the 2 DPMA and
> 2 CLDMA HW blocks that need to be managed during PM flows.
> When a dev_pm_ops function is called, the PM entities list is iterated
> and the matching function is called for each entry in the list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haijun Liu <haijun.liu@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chandrashekar Devegowda <chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Martinez <ricardo.martinez@linux.intel.com>
> ---

> +static int __t7xx_pci_pm_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
...
> +	iowrite32(L1_DISABLE_BIT(0), IREG_BASE(t7xx_dev) + DIS_ASPM_LOWPWR_CLR_0);
> +	return 0;

The success path does this same iowrite32 to DIS_ASPM_LOWPWR_CLR_0
as the failure paths. Is that intended?

The function looks much better now!


-- 
 i.