Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <a537c6e02afbfa26eec2a54dbd8bc649f77ae3a3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: add support to configure 6GHz non-ht
 duplicate transmission
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     "Rameshkumar Sundaram (QUIC)" <quic_ramess@quicinc.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "ath11k@lists.infradead.org" <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:58:16 +0100
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB4937C53041172E9A52846A0BE9169@DM6PR02MB4937.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1644914581-21682-1-git-send-email-quic_ramess@quicinc.com>
         <1644914581-21682-2-git-send-email-quic_ramess@quicinc.com>
         <a517835c51a5eaf00e87fdaaef47546f70ff0d42.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <DM6PR02MB4937C53041172E9A52846A0BE9169@DM6PR02MB4937.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 (3.42.4-1.fc35) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 05:12 +0000, Rameshkumar Sundaram (QUIC) wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I am wondering though if this should even be detected from the HE
> > operation element itself, rather than from the beacon rate settings
> > that are
> > separate in nl80211?
> This is a BW dependent bit in HE Oper IE and user space can switch BW
> (CSA/chan switch scenarios).
> Which can call assign_beacon directly, Hence adding the logic here to
> cover all Beacon change cases.
> 

Yeah but still ... why do we take it from the content rather than adding
a control for it?

johannes