Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Message-ID: <ae0180ae4e73bb32d8f20662b6d9d6a3ead52b95.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [BUG] deadlock in nl80211_vendor_cmd
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     William McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@nxp.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>, kernel-team@android.com,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:06:28 +0100
In-Reply-To: <19e12e6b5f04ba9e5b192001fbe31a3fc47d380a.camel@sipsolutions.net>
References: <0000000000009e9b7105da6d1779@google.com>
         <99eda6d1dad3ff49435b74e539488091642b10a8.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <5d5cf050-7de0-7bad-2407-276970222635@quicinc.com>
         <YjpGlRvcg72zNo8s@google.com>
         <dc556455-51a2-06e8-8ec5-b807c2901b7e@quicinc.com>
         <Yjzpo3TfZxtKPMAG@google.com>
         <19e12e6b5f04ba9e5b192001fbe31a3fc47d380a.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 (3.42.4-1.fc35) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 13:04 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> So we can avoid the potential deadlock in cfg80211 in a few ways:
> 
>  1) export rtnl_lock_unregistering_all() or maybe a variant after
>     refactoring the two versions, to allow cfg80211 to use it, that way
>     netdev_run_todo() can never have a non-empty todo list
> 
>  2) export __rtnl_unlock() so cfg80211 can avoid running
>     netdev_run_todo() in the unlock, personally I like this less because
>     it might encourage random drivers to use it
> 
>  3) completely rework cfg80211's locking, adding a separate mutex for
>     the wiphy list so we don't need to acquire the RTNL at all here
>     (unless the ops need it, but there's no issue if we don't drop it),
>     something like https://p.sipsolutions.net/27d08e1f5881a793.txt
> 

Note that none of these actually let you do what you wanted - that is
acquiring the RTNL in the vendor op itself.

johannes