Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:37:52 -0500
From:   Seth Forshee <sforshee@kernel.org>
To:     Richard Huynh <voxlympha@gmail.com>
Cc:     wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Australia
 (AU)
Message-ID: <YkZlgEfVfiR9EDjl@ubuntu-x1>
References: <20220328062250.15903-1-voxlympha@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220328062250.15903-1-voxlympha@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 05:22:51PM +1100, Richard Huynh wrote:
> Changes allowing lower portion of WiFi 6E spectrum. (5925-6425)
> 
> Amendment: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022L00249
> Full text: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022C00281
> 
> Allows for both 250mW EIRP indoors or 25mW outdoors.
> However, only the former limit is defined in this commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Huynh <voxlympha@gmail.com>
> ---
>  db.txt | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> index e887c73..15de29f 100644
> --- a/db.txt
> +++ b/db.txt
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ country AT: DFS-ETSI
>  	(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
>  
>  # Source:
> -# https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2016C00432
> +# https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022C00281
>  # Both DFS-ETSI and DFS-FCC are acceptable per AS/NZS 4268 Appendix B.
>  # The EIRP for DFS bands can be increased by 3dB if TPC is implemented.
>  # In order to allow 80MHz operation between 5650-5730MHz the upper boundary
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ country AU: DFS-ETSI
>  	(5470 - 5600 @ 80), (27), DFS
>  	(5650 - 5730 @ 80), (27), DFS
>  	(5730 - 5850 @ 80), (36)
> +	(5925 - 6425 @ 160), (24), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
>  	(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (43), NO-OUTDOOR

Thanks for the patch. One small issue though. AUTO-BW doesn't really
make sense here since the range isn't adjacent to any other ranges.
Otherwise it looks fine.

Thanks,
Seth