Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:08:42 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, mka@chromium.org,
        ath11k@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] dt: bindings: net: add bindings of WCN6750 for
 ath11k
Message-ID: <Yk2s+srO9DKP7xW1@robh.at.kernel.org>
References: <20220406094107.17878-1-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
 <20220406094107.17878-2-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220406094107.17878-2-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 06 Apr 2022 15:10:55 +0530, Manikanta Pubbisetty wrote:
> WCN6750 is the WLAN chip on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC SC7280;
> Though being a PCIe based solution, it is not attached to
> the APSS processor (Application Processor SubSystem), it is
> instead attached to another tiny processor called WPSS Q6
> processor (Wireless Processor SubSystem) on the SC7280 MSM,
> where the WLAN firmware runs, and it is the WLAN firmware
> running on the Q6 processor which enumerates WCN6750, as a
> result APPS processor would never know such a device being
> present in the system and would not detect the WCN6750
> hardware unless and otherwise WCN6750 is registered as a
> platform device. This is the reason behind adding WCN6750
> WLAN node in the device tree.
> 
> Add WCN6750 wireless driver support, its based on ath11k driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k.yaml    | 361 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 252 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.