Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <e2fd6542-38fe-a855-1d8f-65799970727e@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:51:37 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] dt: bindings: net: add bindings of WCN6750 for
 ath11k
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <mka@chromium.org>,
        <ath11k@lists.infradead.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220406094107.17878-1-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
 <20220406094107.17878-2-quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
 <Yk2s+srO9DKP7xW1@robh.at.kernel.org>
From:   Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Yk2s+srO9DKP7xW1@robh.at.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 4/6/2022 8:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Apr 2022 15:10:55 +0530, Manikanta Pubbisetty wrote:
>> WCN6750 is the WLAN chip on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC SC7280;
>> Though being a PCIe based solution, it is not attached to
>> the APSS processor (Application Processor SubSystem), it is
>> instead attached to another tiny processor called WPSS Q6
>> processor (Wireless Processor SubSystem) on the SC7280 MSM,
>> where the WLAN firmware runs, and it is the WLAN firmware
>> running on the Q6 processor which enumerates WCN6750, as a
>> result APPS processor would never know such a device being
>> present in the system and would not detect the WCN6750
>> hardware unless and otherwise WCN6750 is registered as a
>> platform device. This is the reason behind adding WCN6750
>> WLAN node in the device tree.
>>
>> Add WCN6750 wireless driver support, its based on ath11k driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k.yaml    | 361 ++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 252 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

There are changes in V4 but nothing significant, I have missed adding 
the tag, will make sure to add relevant tags going forward.

Thanks,
Manikanta