Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGm1_ktEim1vGOf5i=H_sqrPvg=dT50790YYwXgYKgAut-a=ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <YmDpTAu9wmlLijDA@atomide.com> <CAGm1_kv+b1h1OuWr4w5jS_mqfQpXF7UexiWFsOSs+MJK546=ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGm1_ksOt-JtOcTBG7wEqaHagx1NTGYXTMTOG40AN2RELqWKwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YmKaoRfxo4bMzDdR@atomide.com> <87ee1oqq7s.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
In-Reply-To: <87ee1oqq7s.fsf@tynnyri.adurom.net>
From:   Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:43:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGm1_kvjdOdXVd5DTUZZx33dQNxtdc+tiGqnP8mA+Gz73GtXiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: wl18xx: NVS file handling
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Kalle,

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 8:16 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
>
> > * Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com> [220422 10:40]:
> >> Wouldn't we need this functionality [1] to make the NVS fw file optional? :-(
> >>
> >> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-dmaengine/patch/20181112160143.4459-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de/
> >
> > Hmm yeah, how about if we use just an empty nvs file for no warnings then?
>
> What's wrong with firmware_request_nowarn()?

The driver uses asynchronous semantics for NVS loading. Hence, I
didn't want to change this.

Regards,
Yegor