Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <53062c8fbe3eaaa281f24c4808a15804938c83ef.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211: Add support for sending more than two AKMs
 in crypto settings
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Veerendranath Jakkam <quic_vjakkam@quicinc.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Thu, 05 May 2022 09:18:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <22bf2f78-587d-429b-867f-f73e542018d2@quicinc.com>
References: <1650344143-1615-1-git-send-email-quic_vjakkam@quicinc.com>
         <cb419675d2ae276d9b4eac8ab5deafe62167051f.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <22bf2f78-587d-429b-867f-f73e542018d2@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 (3.42.4-2.fc35) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 10:40 +0530, Veerendranath Jakkam wrote:
> 
> On 5/5/2022 2:24 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > I don't know why, but this patch seems to cause memory corruption and
> > various issues when I run the hwsim tests.
> > 
> Oh.. I ran some hwsim tests from hostap.git to verify the changes but 
> didn't face any issues. Are you seeing the issues with any specific 
> hwsim tests? Also, the issues are coming without any of the below 
> changes also(i.e. with actual patch i sent)?

Yes.

I also came to think - where's the upstream driver using this?

I've been saying this for something like a decade now, I think I'll stop
investing time in such patches.

johannes