Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
        pabeni@redhat.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, alex.aring@gmail.com,
        stefan@datenfreihafen.org, mareklindner@neomailbox.ch,
        sw@simonwunderlich.de, a@unstable.cc, sven@narfation.org,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ifdefy the wireless pointers in struct net_device
References: <20220516215638.1787257-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 07:36:54 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20220516215638.1787257-1-kuba@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's
        message of "Mon, 16 May 2022 14:56:38 -0700")
Message-ID: <87zgjgwza1.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:

> Most protocol-specific pointers in struct net_device are under
> a respective ifdef. Wireless is the notable exception. Since
> there's a sizable number of custom-built kernels for datacenter
> workloads which don't build wireless it seems reasonable to
> ifdefy those pointers as well.
>
> While at it move IPv4 and IPv6 pointers up, those are special
> for obvious reasons.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> CC: johannes@sipsolutions.net
> CC: alex.aring@gmail.com
> CC: stefan@datenfreihafen.org
> CC: mareklindner@neomailbox.ch
> CC: sw@simonwunderlich.de
> CC: a@unstable.cc
> CC: sven@narfation.org
> CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org

[...]

> --- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
> +++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
> @@ -8004,10 +8004,7 @@ int cfg80211_register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev);
>   *
>   * Requires the RTNL and wiphy mutex to be held.
>   */
> -static inline void cfg80211_unregister_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> -{
> -	cfg80211_unregister_wdev(dev->ieee80211_ptr);
> -}
> +void cfg80211_unregister_netdevice(struct net_device *dev);
>  
>  /**
>   * struct cfg80211_ft_event_params - FT Information Elements

[...]

> --- a/net/wireless/core.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/core.c
> @@ -1374,6 +1374,12 @@ int cfg80211_register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_register_netdevice);
>  
> +void cfg80211_unregister_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	cfg80211_unregister_wdev(dev->ieee80211_ptr);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_unregister_netdevice);

Why moving this to a proper function? Just curious, I couldn't figure it
out.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches