Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <8e2b5378a073006e99d46f648c0cacd31daf2e2c.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ifdefy the wireless pointers in struct
 net_device
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
        pabeni@redhat.com, alex.aring@gmail.com, stefan@datenfreihafen.org,
        mareklindner@neomailbox.ch, sw@simonwunderlich.de, a@unstable.cc,
        sven@narfation.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 20:03:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20220517104443.68756db3@kernel.org>
References: <20220516215638.1787257-1-kuba@kernel.org>
         <8b9d18e351cc58aed65c4a4c7f12f167984ee088.camel@sipsolutions.net>
         <20220517104443.68756db3@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.1 (3.44.1-1.fc36) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 10:44 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>=20
> Would you be willing to do that as a follow up?=C2=A0
>=20

Sure.

> Are you talking about
> wifi only or all the proto pointers?

Well it only makes sense if at least two protocols join forces :-)

> As a netdev maintainer I'd like to reduce the divergence in whether=20
> the proto pointers are ifdef'd or not.
>=20
Sure, no objection to the ifdef.

johannes