Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <079a7e10-6304-a0bd-2feb-dd9512978738@quicinc.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 19:39:19 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.0
Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: add support for 6 GHz channels and regulatory
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@quicinc.com>,
        <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1638775571-24366-1-git-send-email-quic_adisi@quicinc.com>
 <a86cae34b3b60ab60bc8c456812e7a115f192e56.camel@sipsolutions.net>
From:   Wen Gong <quic_wgong@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <a86cae34b3b60ab60bc8c456812e7a115f192e56.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 5/16/2022 4:02 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:56 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
>
...
> I think you and Wen should go work together and figure out the story as
> you think it should be - I don't have a lot of opinion on it, and thus
> I'm not sure it's reasonable to ask me to figure out all the different
> things.
>
> Please work together and come up with a coherent story of how to handle
> this, hopefully including multi-interface scenarios and maybe regulatory
> database, internal data structures, etc.
>
> johannes

Yes, I plan to give the "cfg80211: save power spectral density(psd) of 
regulatory rule" to Aditya,

and put them together as a patch set and like this:

[PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: save power spectral density(psd) of regulatory rule
[PATCH 2/2] mac80211: add support for 6 GHz channels and regulatory