Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp121880iog; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:45:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uy6rTx0H94YXXVs+Luxy8ol9fAzp8Psy9NDJmWJqigNbdBnRQG2DVIY6CNZJxXN3li9U8k X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f68e:b0:166:4f78:c791 with SMTP id l14-20020a170902f68e00b001664f78c791mr8435274plg.64.1655448310281; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:45:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655448310; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GoA067b2O7t4qYqj6vrkO6/dl3SEEQ0C6HpsirzsckTv12sCoDeN6gfDlXPx2xhGr3 T/OOx8pIXlUTSg8z7sw49yW1E3vTQIQkjBousZTLHpFws1TzUIjn1gzwwB2oP+LdMsXH TkXOyDVFLV0N8iSjwRhA4hMhtb0u23Dc3p8B+Ak0rKLqyTPj98qBSFmWBIQSxUBM59PZ VHyMy0ROtvq7A2YiekfQLhiBEV2tz4UBK8kGIuZrX7oN6AjSdVcvA35Pj5LlWoi+q1wn TFCDbbe06fpsW7VCEQizotQnG3nG7rw5PNBUShEngqU4UDcgyzrzaJlmzjqIrc1Z7tXK dwbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=1DRG1XFhGRMprSVHuCym4V6af13peAjzI5nC4N2gjIc=; b=eMC2QJuoKO47+sTn9gOlKabAqg5SlTSXDLYcEgxYWXLduO/t0ldRulSrHhTXqNZyko PfNfMLoXHOkR4bh+HFHWtecjPcS2bYxXoMfWM6+n67EVxQfEfidI0B/+d9aIV5LNP1ZX SDOuKon/Bm1kcdBfA/4GNURTbBadU34lzdZDyTiq9ijlLDWLnnzqsvQwEPW6KuiQgyGs kT/GplThKmxcKih+F92B0nZwK5V4XOBHOQezkeopiYPwegIzK5QDYhhVwua6wzbWNJ+e xgreLe2B0go7wH3bMse1q2iNK/+cG07FK6klXIZsTE21GFW4I2jXLhxE37D+RskD96Xf eyTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f21-20020a056a0022d500b0051cb8b91215si5823424pfj.293.2022.06.16.23.44.30; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1379788AbiFQGjG (ORCPT + 65 others); Fri, 17 Jun 2022 02:39:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50612 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237248AbiFQGjE (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2022 02:39:04 -0400 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8234::]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8C656F9E for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 23:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:eca4:7d19:f9a2:22c5]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1o25d9-0005uy-Rs; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: <28d2123f-65ce-f69c-12e1-f672b26225f4@leemhuis.info> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:38:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: Bug 215635 - iwlwifi: Firmware crash with firmware 36.ca7b901d.0 (8265-36.ucode) Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski , golan.ben.ami@intel.com, Luca Coelho , Johannes Berg , Gregory Greenman Cc: Udo Steinberg , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "regressions@lists.linux.dev" References: <915d6d66-4e42-8cbf-76bc-0f2f72d5e7d6@leemhuis.info> <20220616115808.141dec76@kernel.org> From: Thorsten Leemhuis In-Reply-To: <20220616115808.141dec76@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1655447943;843236fb; X-HE-SMSGID: 1o25d9-0005uy-Rs X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org CCing Gregory, which became iwlwifi maintainer inbetween. On 16.06.22 20:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:51:38 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. >> >> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org that afaics isn't >> properly handled, that's why I decided to forward it to the lists and a >> few relevant people to the CC. To quote from >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215635 : BTW, Udo recently confirmed there that the issue still happens on 5.18. >>> Seeing the following firmware crash frequently with >>> firmware-version: 36.ca7b901d.0 8265-36.ucode >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Afterwards iwlwifi is entirely unusable, i.e. the hardware does not recover. >> >>> I have not been able to observe the problem with 5.15.x so far. >>> >>> The problem manifests either by Wi-Fi becoming entirely unresponsive (not even ping to gateway works anymore) or by producing a firmware crash. >>> >>> In response to #3, the problem was most recently observed as a firmware crash on Linux 5.16.13. HW is Intel Corporation Wireless 8265 / 8275 (rev 78) (Windstorm Peak) and firmware version 36.ca7b901d.0 8265-36.ucode. >>> >>> I'm attaching the dmesg output from 5.16.13 (with the TWT patch mentioned above applied) which includes a firmware crash. >> >> Could somebody take a look into this? Or was this discussed somewhere >> else already? Or even fixed? > > Any progress / outputs on this one? Folks are reporting it's still > happening on Fedora 36 w/ 5.17.13. Jakub, thx for bringing this up, I had "look into this again" on my todo list for some time already. Out of interest: where where those reports? Besides the one the quoted mail is about (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215635 ) I'm aware of two other reports that look similar and might or might not be related (hard to tell without domain knowledge, I guess it might be just similar symptoms): https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215697 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215789 Gregory, are you aware of these regressions? Is anyone working on them? Or is this faulty hw or something like that? Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.