Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp4819856iog; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:32:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t5O7TaywuFz2mKqS1Xe+KMHqR2X9gZvrM7TfYbIeGdHz6bvVOvwnGu+Ec+jGMRxav2nnxW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2af:b0:525:13b0:4099 with SMTP id q15-20020a056a0002af00b0052513b04099mr22033937pfs.71.1655904732371; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:32:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655904732; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cZNd0enlQq/7PjP4oDmHAomh0XX4AJFuSo1wGFa6b+eOfN+n+e1djgisWVNuDuxbnQ iWNcYXP+t1TvtBTm/hQ4UX0yrbSJk3DTD7ljgG2OGROKyF7KPz/81r1pGUa7vAIB6nP0 8D+KF8zTVCXIqdxxN9/3ITAF4lLcveuT9ksHX4iDvZXGytqrj4fN24fm0U7hZRVucXjP 2UMMZzL0iPNiGogdz6zX+Ffl9/gGNn695SvikjebzwiE1GdoEnhH892h6llrriHqijXa sKaaFfLbqbIStCUKODIj4yCBVBeBANcYQ0aGR8sddfOkkBKLQGxykAy+P/R7OK7jb/XQ T+wg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :feedback-id:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:reply-to:cc :from:to:dkim-signature:date; bh=PtcpJojz301RxWLmBJ3699vVtlYYcLr2E1q7TyKImqk=; b=SmEQoxjdp8UR/Ff8Ti38C4vCrRT2PGVD8gCDJyzSlu2HKjkPyMs+9X3IVfdKQ6/05m WREACh+2Gw9PzpkMf9I6DMq+c3xrUjr+x2Xn9CYasOGdX1qnuZUlGBRlN8BAA9MRLCyL TvsAG07cKH3QiuTmnPzDKZs1TjE5vRmQTF9T4MI4DAWahph+VkCeRO469bjUXmCS/XBV 8fftpFSujj5KvKzjiO2WHRnCPusFVww/c3ZwYDHr64ALFb3+5I07QZZyFUEG/xz5Rycr UwWrB73NVpRlgIbNFiWW5ibx1WfncEH8QFwT2Eo/CIxGwoyqvDsJi0MGZVxoTKT35H/J CbVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@dannyvanheumen.nl header.s=protonmail2 header.b=oXCHGUGU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=dannyvanheumen.nl Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5-20020a630105000000b0040d22b45aadsi2853801pgb.459.2022.06.22.06.31.55; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@dannyvanheumen.nl header.s=protonmail2 header.b=oXCHGUGU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=dannyvanheumen.nl Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231546AbiFVNbV (ORCPT + 65 others); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:31:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52932 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1357449AbiFVNaw (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:30:52 -0400 Received: from mail-4317.proton.ch (mail-4317.proton.ch [185.70.43.17]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF6FBE2 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:30:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:30:40 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dannyvanheumen.nl; s=protonmail2; t=1655904648; x=1656163848; bh=PtcpJojz301RxWLmBJ3699vVtlYYcLr2E1q7TyKImqk=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=oXCHGUGUdae4vDAN7L4vmqVVUWr2itWn1QN5lCGOjnJnDYPdSGwKkxvgrO+EM6/0u ld92wvCH4jDXS7JwsOLOuDadGbirXCPcOuUyhx1o9fGmnEAlHqMXKAL3ualureTqof +nOwY3LeJ079jjG8izy+TQMx8LduVGjjgeqmOKg9JFK62BHePHJ/iiUD9qflINmK3b X0Lf9fS6ObIkRlfKAamISrKA8zTH0lzpeCPZ09xQUFr9yUObw+edfORP9hI8tnOXSP ZRb1PeUIWdc0gz5A2LcSKplbzZ40KWGhFJBYXuV4GCv6cSLd/ZcboAx4/K/2L1Llb+ ES5SUdGSoHUHw== To: Arend van Spriel From: Danny van Heumen Cc: Franky Lin , Arend van Spriel , Hante Meuleman , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@infineon.com Reply-To: Danny van Heumen Subject: Re: [PATCH] work-in-progress: double-free after hardware reset due to firmware-crash Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: =?us-ascii?Q?_<1a116224-66ff-17b1-bb8b-9c0918dd47e4@broadcom.com>___<1815e2011e8.279b.9b12b7fc0a3841636cfb5e919b41b954@broadcom.com>___<45d90d65-cd0e-e65f-edcf-d55802a4a6bd@broadcom.com>__?= Feedback-ID: 15073070:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Hi Arend, ------- Original Message ------- On Wednesday, June 22nd, 2022 at 11:36, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 6/21/2022 3:18 PM, Danny van Heumen wrote: > > > Hi Arend, > > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > On Tuesday, June 21st, 2022 at 09:41, Arend van Spriel arend.vanspriel@= broadcom.com wrote: > > > > > [..] > > > > > > Maybe overlooked, but I have not seen a patch from you on the > > > linux-wireless list. Do you have reference, ie. URL or Message-ID? > > > > I'm not sure what's most convenient here, but here's an archive link: > > https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-wireless&m=3D165547582612979 > > > > Message-ID: ThT2jwvySn9tFQm9FxrlPNMQkiGUnx_87cOhmmeexoVOFZqOkpjmAntCWG- > > kIBMj2830LHZaOULlJxQKiRXkVtGYrrT8rBaB7R65qjIinYo=3D () dannyvanheumen != nl > > > Found it. Had to check my gmail account instead of my work account. > > > You haven't commented yet on my question regarding definition macro for= the clm_blob. > > I intend to send a patch for it, because I believe at the very least so= me parts of distribution > > processes rely on these firmware entries. It would be good if you can c= onfirm. > > > The clm_blob is optional unless the firmware image was built without any > clm data. If that is the case for 43456 (I think it is not) than it > should be reflected with BRCMF_FW_CLM_DEF(). Otherwise it is fine as it > is right now. Okay. I checked a few of the binary blobs, some are built with and some are= built without (`strings` gives me a line with 'noclm' in it or with 'clm' = and some revision/identifier) This is a bit of guessing on my part. I will leave it as is then. Regards, Danny