Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] mac80211: add TPC support in control path
From:   Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50d80bebabe0ce2413af89af7bf45321ac7f0d6b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Mon, 29 Aug 2022 17:19:45 +0200
Cc:     =?utf-8?Q?Thomas_H=C3=BChn?= <thomas.huehn@hs-nordhausen.de>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
        "nbd@nbd.name" <nbd@nbd.name>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D322E049-6B08-402D-AB95-982363369028@gmail.com>
References: <20220829144147.484787-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
 <5175b7f95442eff1f8e899feee3d3aeb330fb61e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
 <5AA24131-A7E9-451D-97AB-97D925B2A53A@hs-nordhausen.de>
 <8867d4a7552fc036da51ef5451ead1fd4df7f139.camel@sipsolutions.net>
 <50d80bebabe0ce2413af89af7bf45321ac7f0d6b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Precedence: bulk

Good point, definitely makes sense.

Would this be sufficient as an implementation for this RFC?

Greetings
Jonas

> On 29. Aug 2022, at 16:52, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 16:52 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 16:51 +0200, Thomas H=C3=BChn wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Compile-Tested: current wireless-next tree with all flags on
>>>>> Tested-on PCEngines APU with ath9k WiFi device on OpenWrt Linux
>>>>>       Kernel 5.10.137
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> That seems just a little old? Not sure I'd trust that given the =
major
>>>> changes in the tree recently?
>>>=20
>>> Good point, we can test this with 5.15.63 by enabling the OpenWrt =
testing kernel =E2=80=A6 would that be ok ?
>>>=20
>>=20
>> Well a lot of major changes just happened 5.19 -> 6.0, so something =
more
>> recent would be better?
>>=20
>=20
> Maybe you could add support in hwsim?
>=20
> johannes