Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <6b577581-9daf-ff11-1aaa-ff1243eb9c03@cesarb.eti.br>
Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2022 19:21:50 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR)
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, sforshee@kernel.org
Cc:     wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220901232734.5488-1-cesarb@cesarb.eti.br>
 <b8674e67fee2393d4c5fe9d9842028545c6adcfa.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.eti.br>
In-Reply-To: <b8674e67fee2393d4c5fe9d9842028545c6adcfa.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Em 02/09/2022 11:53, Johannes Berg escreveu:
> On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 20:27 -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
>>
>> +	# This range ends at 5725 MHz, but channel 144 extends to 5730 MHz.
>> +	# Since 5725 ~ 5730 MHz belongs to the next range which has looser
>> +	# requirements, we can extend the range by 5 MHz to make the kernel
>> +	# happy and be able to use channel 144.
>> +	(5470 - 5730 @ 160), (27), DFS
>> +	(5730 - 5850 @ 80), (30)
>>
> 
> If you do the latter as 160 as well, and add AUTO-BW, couldn't you split
> them at 5725 correctly? But I guess it doesn't matter anyway.

This was copied from the US rules (including the four-line comment), 
which have an identical split. If AUTO-BW worked here, I'd expect the US 
rules to use it.

-- 
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@cesarb.eti.br