Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        Christian =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, dev@openvswitch.org,
        x86@kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] iwlwifi: Track scan_cmd allocation size explicitly
References: <20220922031013.2150682-1-keescook@chromium.org>
        <20220922031013.2150682-11-keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 07:18:51 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20220922031013.2150682-11-keescook@chromium.org> (Kees Cook's
        message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2022 20:10:11 -0700")
Message-ID: <87fsgk6nys.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:

> In preparation for reducing the use of ksize(), explicitly track the
> size of scan_cmd allocations. This also allows for noticing if the scan
> size changes unexpectedly. Note that using ksize() was already incorrect
> here, in the sense that ksize() would not match the actual allocation
> size, which would trigger future run-time allocation bounds checking.
> (In other words, memset() may know how large scan_cmd was allocated for,
> but ksize() will return the upper bounds of the actually allocated memory,
> causing a run-time warning about an overflow.)
>
> Cc: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Via which tree is this iwlwifi patch going? Normally via wireless-next
or something else?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches